On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 8:10 PM, David Cohen
wrote:
> But at least on ACPI case, GPIO API blocks the ability to create
> children platform devices that require GPIO as platform data, despite
> we've many drivers on upstream that expect this behavior: e.g. extcon-gpio.c
>
> Are we considering
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 8:10 PM, David Cohen
david.a.co...@linux.intel.com wrote:
But at least on ACPI case, GPIO API blocks the ability to create
children platform devices that require GPIO as platform data, despite
we've many drivers on upstream that expect this behavior: e.g. extcon-gpio.c
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 09:46:00AM -0700, David Cohen wrote:
> Adding Mika to CC list.
Grrr :(
Adding for real now.
>
> Br, David
>
> On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 12:10:51PM -0700, David Cohen wrote:
> > Hi Linus,
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 11:16:08AM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > > On Sat,
Adding Mika to CC list.
Br, David
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 12:10:51PM -0700, David Cohen wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 11:16:08AM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 07, 2015 at 09:06:22PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 8:17 PM, David Cohen
> >
Adding Mika to CC list.
Br, David
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 12:10:51PM -0700, David Cohen wrote:
Hi Linus,
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 11:16:08AM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Sat, Mar 07, 2015 at 09:06:22PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 8:17 PM, David Cohen
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 09:46:00AM -0700, David Cohen wrote:
Adding Mika to CC list.
Grrr :(
Adding for real now.
Br, David
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 12:10:51PM -0700, David Cohen wrote:
Hi Linus,
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 11:16:08AM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Sat, Mar 07, 2015
Hi Linus,
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 11:16:08AM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 07, 2015 at 09:06:22PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 8:17 PM, David Cohen
> > wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 10:53:44AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> >
> > >> I would put this
On Sat, Mar 07, 2015 at 09:06:22PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 8:17 PM, David Cohen
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 10:53:44AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
>
> >> I would put this adjacent to the phy driver somewhere in drivers/usb/*
> >> and make the actual
On Sat, Mar 07, 2015 at 09:06:22PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 8:17 PM, David Cohen
david.a.co...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 10:53:44AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
I would put this adjacent to the phy driver somewhere in drivers/usb/*
and make
Hi Linus,
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 11:16:08AM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Sat, Mar 07, 2015 at 09:06:22PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 8:17 PM, David Cohen
david.a.co...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 10:53:44AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
I
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 8:17 PM, David Cohen
wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 10:53:44AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> I would put this adjacent to the phy driver somewhere in drivers/usb/*
>> and make the actual USB-driver thing handle its GPIOs directly.
>> But I guess David and Felipe have
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 9:40 PM, David Cohen
wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 02:00:26PM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 11:59:27AM -0800, David Cohen wrote:
>> > I'd need to lookup GPIOs via ACPI without requesting them on mfd driver
>> > and then give them to children
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 8:17 PM, David Cohen
david.a.co...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 10:53:44AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
I would put this adjacent to the phy driver somewhere in drivers/usb/*
and make the actual USB-driver thing handle its GPIOs directly.
But I guess
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 9:40 PM, David Cohen
david.a.co...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 02:00:26PM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 11:59:27AM -0800, David Cohen wrote:
I'd need to lookup GPIOs via ACPI without requesting them on mfd driver
and then give
Hi,
[snip]
> Felipe suggested to "divide to conquer" instead of having a single
> extcon driver to handle all these functions:
>
> - The mux functions would be controlled by a possible new pinctrl-gpio
> driver (Linus, your input here would be nice :)
> - The VBUS would be a fixed regulator
> -
Hi,
[snip]
Felipe suggested to divide to conquer instead of having a single
extcon driver to handle all these functions:
- The mux functions would be controlled by a possible new pinctrl-gpio
driver (Linus, your input here would be nice :)
- The VBUS would be a fixed regulator
- The USB
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 02:00:26PM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 11:59:27AM -0800, David Cohen wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 01:36:06PM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 11:17:00AM -0800, David Cohen wrote:
> > > > Hi Linus and Robert,
> > > >
>
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 11:59:27AM -0800, David Cohen wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 01:36:06PM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 11:17:00AM -0800, David Cohen wrote:
> > > Hi Linus and Robert,
> > >
> > > CC'ing Heikki as it involves a RFC from him.
> > >
> > > On Fri,
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 01:36:06PM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 11:17:00AM -0800, David Cohen wrote:
> > Hi Linus and Robert,
> >
> > CC'ing Heikki as it involves a RFC from him.
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 10:53:44AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 20,
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 11:17:00AM -0800, David Cohen wrote:
> Hi Linus and Robert,
>
> CC'ing Heikki as it involves a RFC from him.
>
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 10:53:44AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 7:41 AM, Robert Baldyga
> > wrote:
> > > Hi David,
> > >
> > > On
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 08:10:34PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-02-20 at 11:02 -0800, David Cohen wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:39:06PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2015-02-19 at 11:59 -0800, David Cohen wrote:
> > > > As always, comments are welcome.
> > >
> > > Are
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 01:09:00PM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 11:02:26AM -0800, David Cohen wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:39:06PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2015-02-19 at 11:59 -0800, David Cohen wrote:
> > > > As always, comments are
Hi Linus and Robert,
CC'ing Heikki as it involves a RFC from him.
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 10:53:44AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 7:41 AM, Robert Baldyga wrote:
> > Hi David,
> >
> > On 02/19/2015 08:59 PM, David Cohen wrote:
> >> Some Intel platforms have an USB OTG
On Fri, 2015-02-20 at 11:02 -0800, David Cohen wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:39:06PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-02-19 at 11:59 -0800, David Cohen wrote:
> > > As always, comments are welcome.
> >
> > Are nits welcome too?
> >
> > > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPLv2");
> >
> > You
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 11:02:26AM -0800, David Cohen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:39:06PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-02-19 at 11:59 -0800, David Cohen wrote:
> > > As always, comments are welcome.
> >
> > Are nits welcome too?
> >
> > > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPLv2");
>
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:39:06PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-02-19 at 11:59 -0800, David Cohen wrote:
> > As always, comments are welcome.
>
> Are nits welcome too?
>
> > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPLv2");
>
> You probably meant
> MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2")
>
> Didn't that trigger
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 7:41 AM, Robert Baldyga wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On 02/19/2015 08:59 PM, David Cohen wrote:
>> Some Intel platforms have an USB OTG port fully (or partially)
>> controlled by GPIOs:
>>
>> (1) USB ID is connected directly to a pulled up GPIO.
>>
>> Optionally:
>> (2) VBUS is
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 7:41 AM, Robert Baldyga r.bald...@samsung.com wrote:
Hi David,
On 02/19/2015 08:59 PM, David Cohen wrote:
Some Intel platforms have an USB OTG port fully (or partially)
controlled by GPIOs:
(1) USB ID is connected directly to a pulled up GPIO.
Optionally:
(2) VBUS
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 02:00:26PM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 11:59:27AM -0800, David Cohen wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 01:36:06PM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 11:17:00AM -0800, David Cohen wrote:
Hi Linus and Robert,
CC'ing
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:39:06PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
On Thu, 2015-02-19 at 11:59 -0800, David Cohen wrote:
As always, comments are welcome.
Are nits welcome too?
+MODULE_LICENSE(GPLv2);
You probably meant
MODULE_LICENSE(GPL v2)
Didn't that trigger a warning or
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 11:02:26AM -0800, David Cohen wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:39:06PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
On Thu, 2015-02-19 at 11:59 -0800, David Cohen wrote:
As always, comments are welcome.
Are nits welcome too?
+MODULE_LICENSE(GPLv2);
You probably
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 08:10:34PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
On Fri, 2015-02-20 at 11:02 -0800, David Cohen wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:39:06PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
On Thu, 2015-02-19 at 11:59 -0800, David Cohen wrote:
As always, comments are welcome.
Are nits welcome
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 01:09:00PM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 11:02:26AM -0800, David Cohen wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:39:06PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
On Thu, 2015-02-19 at 11:59 -0800, David Cohen wrote:
As always, comments are welcome.
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 11:17:00AM -0800, David Cohen wrote:
Hi Linus and Robert,
CC'ing Heikki as it involves a RFC from him.
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 10:53:44AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 7:41 AM, Robert Baldyga r.bald...@samsung.com
wrote:
Hi David,
On Fri, 2015-02-20 at 11:02 -0800, David Cohen wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:39:06PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
On Thu, 2015-02-19 at 11:59 -0800, David Cohen wrote:
As always, comments are welcome.
Are nits welcome too?
+MODULE_LICENSE(GPLv2);
You probably meant
Hi Linus and Robert,
CC'ing Heikki as it involves a RFC from him.
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 10:53:44AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 7:41 AM, Robert Baldyga r.bald...@samsung.com wrote:
Hi David,
On 02/19/2015 08:59 PM, David Cohen wrote:
Some Intel platforms have an
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 01:36:06PM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 11:17:00AM -0800, David Cohen wrote:
Hi Linus and Robert,
CC'ing Heikki as it involves a RFC from him.
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 10:53:44AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 7:41
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 11:59:27AM -0800, David Cohen wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 01:36:06PM -0600, Felipe Balbi wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 11:17:00AM -0800, David Cohen wrote:
Hi Linus and Robert,
CC'ing Heikki as it involves a RFC from him.
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at
Hi David,
On 02/19/2015 08:59 PM, David Cohen wrote:
> Some Intel platforms have an USB OTG port fully (or partially)
> controlled by GPIOs:
>
> (1) USB ID is connected directly to a pulled up GPIO.
>
> Optionally:
> (2) VBUS is enabled/disabled by a GPIO
> (3) Platform has 2 USB controllers
On Thu, 2015-02-19 at 11:59 -0800, David Cohen wrote:
> As always, comments are welcome.
Are nits welcome too?
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPLv2");
You probably meant
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2")
Didn't that trigger a warning or error?
Paul Bolle
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Some Intel platforms have an USB OTG port fully (or partially)
controlled by GPIOs:
(1) USB ID is connected directly to a pulled up GPIO.
Optionally:
(2) VBUS is enabled/disabled by a GPIO
(3) Platform has 2 USB controllers connected to same port: one for
device and one for host role. D+/-
Some Intel platforms have an USB OTG port fully (or partially)
controlled by GPIOs:
(1) USB ID is connected directly to a pulled up GPIO.
Optionally:
(2) VBUS is enabled/disabled by a GPIO
(3) Platform has 2 USB controllers connected to same port: one for
device and one for host role. D+/-
On Thu, 2015-02-19 at 11:59 -0800, David Cohen wrote:
As always, comments are welcome.
Are nits welcome too?
+MODULE_LICENSE(GPLv2);
You probably meant
MODULE_LICENSE(GPL v2)
Didn't that trigger a warning or error?
Paul Bolle
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
Hi David,
On 02/19/2015 08:59 PM, David Cohen wrote:
Some Intel platforms have an USB OTG port fully (or partially)
controlled by GPIOs:
(1) USB ID is connected directly to a pulled up GPIO.
Optionally:
(2) VBUS is enabled/disabled by a GPIO
(3) Platform has 2 USB controllers connected
44 matches
Mail list logo