On 07/15, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2018/7/15 11:13, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > On 07/15, Chao Yu wrote:
> >> Hi Jaegeuk,
> >>
> >> On 2018/7/15 9:27, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> >>> On 07/08, Chao Yu wrote:
> >>>> From: Chao Yu <yuch...@huawei.com>
> >>>>
> >>>> Some devices has small max_{hw,}discard_sectors, so that in
> >>>> __blkdev_issue_discard(), one big size discard bio can be split
> >>>> into multiple small size discard bios, result in heavy load in IO
> >>>> scheduler and device, which can hang other sync IO for long time.
> >>>>
> >>>> Now, f2fs is trying to control discard commands more elaboratively,
> >>>> in order to make less conflict in between discard IO and user IO
> >>>> to enhance application's performance, so in this patch, we will
> >>>> split discard bio in f2fs in prior to in block layer to reduce
> >>>> issuing multiple discard bios in a short time.
> >>>
> >>> Can we just change __submit_discard_cmd() to submit the large candidate
> >>> partially and adjust lstart in the original candidate?
> >>
> >> Yep, could you check __submit_discard_cmd() implementation below? Does that
> >> match the thoughts from you?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuch...@huawei.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> v2:
> >>>> - change to split discard command entry before submission.
> >>>>  fs/f2fs/f2fs.h    |  13 +++---
> >>>>  fs/f2fs/segment.c | 117 
> >>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> >>>>  2 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> >>>> index c48b655d5d8d..359526d88d3f 100644
> >>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> >>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> >>>> @@ -178,7 +178,6 @@ enum {
> >>>>  
> >>>>  #define MAX_DISCARD_BLOCKS(sbi)         BLKS_PER_SEC(sbi)
> >>>>  #define DEF_MAX_DISCARD_REQUEST         8       /* issue 8 discards per 
> >>>> round */
> >>>> -#define DEF_MAX_DISCARD_LEN             512     /* Max. 2MB per discard 
> >>>> */
> >>>>  #define DEF_MIN_DISCARD_ISSUE_TIME      50      /* 50 ms, if exists */
> >>>>  #define DEF_MID_DISCARD_ISSUE_TIME      500     /* 500 ms, if device 
> >>>> busy */
> >>>>  #define DEF_MAX_DISCARD_ISSUE_TIME      60000   /* 60 s, if no 
> >>>> candidates */
> >>>> @@ -709,22 +708,22 @@ static inline void set_extent_info(struct 
> >>>> extent_info *ei, unsigned int fofs,
> >>>>  }
> >>>>  
> >>>>  static inline bool __is_discard_mergeable(struct discard_info *back,
> >>>> -                                                struct discard_info 
> >>>> *front)
> >>>> +                        struct discard_info *front, unsigned int 
> >>>> max_len)
> >>>>  {
> >>>>          return (back->lstart + back->len == front->lstart) &&
> >>>> -                (back->len + front->len < DEF_MAX_DISCARD_LEN);
> >>>> +                (back->len + front->len <= max_len);
> >>>>  }
> >>>>  
> >>>>  static inline bool __is_discard_back_mergeable(struct discard_info *cur,
> >>>> -                                                struct discard_info 
> >>>> *back)
> >>>> +                        struct discard_info *back, unsigned int max_len)
> >>>>  {
> >>>> -        return __is_discard_mergeable(back, cur);
> >>>> +        return __is_discard_mergeable(back, cur, max_len);
> >>>>  }
> >>>>  
> >>>>  static inline bool __is_discard_front_mergeable(struct discard_info 
> >>>> *cur,
> >>>> -                                                struct discard_info 
> >>>> *front)
> >>>> +                        struct discard_info *front, unsigned int 
> >>>> max_len)
> >>>>  {
> >>>> -        return __is_discard_mergeable(cur, front);
> >>>> +        return __is_discard_mergeable(cur, front, max_len);
> >>>>  }
> >>>>  
> >>>>  static inline bool __is_extent_mergeable(struct extent_info *back,
> >>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> >>>> index f7f56dd091b4..cbf8f3f9a8e7 100644
> >>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> >>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> >>>> @@ -966,17 +966,24 @@ static void __init_discard_policy(struct 
> >>>> f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> >>>>          }
> >>>>  }
> >>>>  
> >>>> -
> > 
> > ===================== BEGIN
> > 
> >>>> +static void __update_discard_tree_range(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> >>>> +                                struct block_device *bdev, block_t 
> >>>> lstart,
> >>>> +                                block_t start, block_t len);
> >>>>  /* this function is copied from blkdev_issue_discard from 
> >>>> block/blk-lib.c */
> >>>>  static void __submit_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> >>>>                                                  struct discard_policy 
> >>>> *dpolicy,
> >>>> -                                                struct discard_cmd *dc)
> >>>> +                                                struct discard_cmd *dc,
> >>>> +                                                unsigned int *issued)
> >>>>  {
> >>>> +        struct block_device *bdev = dc->bdev;
> >>>> +        struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(bdev);
> >>>> +        unsigned int max_discard_blocks =
> >>>> +                        SECTOR_TO_BLOCK(q->limits.max_discard_sectors);
> >>>>          struct discard_cmd_control *dcc = SM_I(sbi)->dcc_info;
> >>>>          struct list_head *wait_list = (dpolicy->type == DPOLICY_FSTRIM) 
> >>>> ?
> >>>>                                          &(dcc->fstrim_list) : 
> >>>> &(dcc->wait_list);
> >>>> -        struct bio *bio = NULL;
> >>>>          int flag = dpolicy->sync ? REQ_SYNC : 0;
> >>>> +        block_t lstart, start, len, total_len;
> >>>>  
> >>>>          if (dc->state != D_PREP)
> >>>>                  return;
> >>>> @@ -984,30 +991,63 @@ static void __submit_discard_cmd(struct 
> >>>> f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> >>>>          if (is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_NEED_FSCK))
> >>>>                  return;
> >>>>  
> >>>> -        trace_f2fs_issue_discard(dc->bdev, dc->start, dc->len);
> >>>> -
> >>>> -        dc->error = __blkdev_issue_discard(dc->bdev,
> >>>> -                                SECTOR_FROM_BLOCK(dc->start),
> >>>> -                                SECTOR_FROM_BLOCK(dc->len),
> >>>> -                                GFP_NOFS, 0, &bio);
> >>>> -        if (!dc->error) {
> >>>> -                /* should keep before submission to avoid D_DONE right 
> >>>> away */
> >>>> -                dc->state = D_SUBMIT;
> >>>> -                atomic_inc(&dcc->issued_discard);
> >>>> -                atomic_inc(&dcc->issing_discard);
> >>>> -                if (bio) {
> >>>> -                        bio->bi_private = dc;
> >>>> -                        bio->bi_end_io = f2fs_submit_discard_endio;
> >>>> -                        bio->bi_opf |= flag;
> >>>> -                        submit_bio(bio);
> >>>> -                        list_move_tail(&dc->list, wait_list);
> >>>> -                        __check_sit_bitmap(sbi, dc->start, dc->start + 
> >>>> dc->len);
> >>>> -
> >>>> -                        f2fs_update_iostat(sbi, FS_DISCARD, 1);
> >>>> +        trace_f2fs_issue_discard(bdev, dc->start, dc->len);
> >>>> +
> >>>> +        lstart = dc->lstart;
> >>>> +        start = dc->start;
> >>>> +        len = dc->len;
> >>>> +        total_len = len;
> >>>> +
> >>>> +        while (total_len && *issued < dpolicy->max_requests) {
> >>>> +                struct bio *bio = NULL;
> >>>> +
> >>>> +                if (len > max_discard_blocks)
> >>>> +                        len = max_discard_blocks;
> >>>> +
> >>>> +                dc->error = __blkdev_issue_discard(bdev,
> >>>> +                                        SECTOR_FROM_BLOCK(start),
> >>>> +                                        SECTOR_FROM_BLOCK(len),
> >>>> +                                        GFP_NOFS, 0, &bio);
> >>>> +                if (!dc->error) {
> >>>> +                        /*
> >>>> +                         * should keep before submission to avoid D_DONE
> >>>> +                         * right away
> >>>> +                         */
> >>>> +                        dc->state = D_SUBMIT;
> >>>> +                        dc->len = len;
> >>>> +                        atomic_inc(&dcc->issued_discard);
> >>>> +                        atomic_inc(&dcc->issing_discard);
> >>>> +                        if (bio) {
> >>>> +                                bio->bi_private = dc;
> >>>> +                                bio->bi_end_io = 
> >>>> f2fs_submit_discard_endio;
> >>>> +                                bio->bi_opf |= flag;
> >>>> +                                submit_bio(bio);
> >>>> +                                list_move_tail(&dc->list, wait_list);
> >>>> +                                __check_sit_bitmap(sbi, dc->start,
> >>>> +                                                        dc->start + 
> >>>> dc->len);
> >>>> +
> >>>> +                                f2fs_update_iostat(sbi, FS_DISCARD, 1);
> >>>> +                        }
> >>>> +                } else {
> >>>> +                        __remove_discard_cmd(sbi, dc);
> > 
> > Keep the original one, since it's partially failed?
> 
> During __submit_discard_cmd(), we are trying to split original dc into 
> multiple
> dc, and once we failed to submit some of them, we will remove corresponding 
> dc,
> the removal logic is the same as before, not being changed...
> 
> If we want to keep failed dc and do retry, we'd better add another patch for
> that, right?

I thought removing failed portion of the dc.

> 
> > 
> >>>> +                        return;
> >>>> +                }
> >>>> +                lstart += len;
> >>>> +                start += len;
> >>>> +                total_len -= len;
> >>>> +                len = total_len;
> >>>> +                (*issued)++;
> >>>> +
> >>>> +                if (len) {
> >>>> +                        __update_discard_tree_range(sbi, bdev, lstart,
> >>>> +                                                                start, 
> >>>> len);
> > 
> > Do we really need this? We already grabbed one candidate which was not 
> > merged
> > well.
> 
> You mean submitting multiple bios based on one large size dc?

Yes.

> 
> Previously, one bio references to one dc as below, in end_io, it will change
> dc->state which can be detected by its own waiter.
> 
>       bio->bi_private = dc;
>       bio->bi_end_io = f2fs_submit_discard_endio;
>       bio->bi_opf |= flag;
> 
> If multiple bios reference to one dc, it will be more complicated to handle
> that. How do you think?

I was concerned about too many entries in the lists. How about adding a refcnt
to count how many bios were issued on the dc?

Thanks,

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> > 
> >>>> +                        dc = (struct discard_cmd *)f2fs_lookup_rb_tree(
> >>>> +                                                &dcc->root, NULL, 
> >>>> lstart);
> >>>> +                        f2fs_bug_on(sbi, !dc);
> >>>>                  }
> >>>> -        } else {
> >>>> -                __remove_discard_cmd(sbi, dc);
> >>>>          }
> >>>> +
> >>>> +        return;
> >>>>  }
> > 
> > ======================= END
> > 
> > 
> >>>>  
> >>>>  static struct discard_cmd *__insert_discard_tree(struct f2fs_sb_info 
> >>>> *sbi,
> >>>> @@ -1088,10 +1128,11 @@ static void __update_discard_tree_range(struct 
> >>>> f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> >>>>          struct discard_cmd *dc;
> >>>>          struct discard_info di = {0};
> >>>>          struct rb_node **insert_p = NULL, *insert_parent = NULL;
> >>>> +        struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(bdev);
> >>>> +        unsigned int max_discard_blocks =
> >>>> +                        SECTOR_TO_BLOCK(q->limits.max_discard_sectors);
> >>>>          block_t end = lstart + len;
> >>>>  
> >>>> -        mutex_lock(&dcc->cmd_lock);
> >>>> -
> >>>>          dc = (struct discard_cmd *)f2fs_lookup_rb_tree_ret(&dcc->root,
> >>>>                                          NULL, lstart,
> >>>>                                          (struct rb_entry **)&prev_dc,
> >>>> @@ -1131,7 +1172,8 @@ static void __update_discard_tree_range(struct 
> >>>> f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> >>>>  
> >>>>                  if (prev_dc && prev_dc->state == D_PREP &&
> >>>>                          prev_dc->bdev == bdev &&
> >>>> -                        __is_discard_back_mergeable(&di, &prev_dc->di)) 
> >>>> {
> >>>> +                        __is_discard_back_mergeable(&di, &prev_dc->di,
> >>>> +                                                        
> >>>> max_discard_blocks)) {
> >>>>                          prev_dc->di.len += di.len;
> >>>>                          dcc->undiscard_blks += di.len;
> >>>>                          __relocate_discard_cmd(dcc, prev_dc);
> >>>> @@ -1142,7 +1184,8 @@ static void __update_discard_tree_range(struct 
> >>>> f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> >>>>  
> >>>>                  if (next_dc && next_dc->state == D_PREP &&
> >>>>                          next_dc->bdev == bdev &&
> >>>> -                        __is_discard_front_mergeable(&di, 
> >>>> &next_dc->di)) {
> >>>> +                        __is_discard_front_mergeable(&di, &next_dc->di,
> >>>> +                                                        
> >>>> max_discard_blocks)) {
> >>>>                          next_dc->di.lstart = di.lstart;
> >>>>                          next_dc->di.len += di.len;
> >>>>                          next_dc->di.start = di.start;
> >>>> @@ -1165,8 +1208,6 @@ static void __update_discard_tree_range(struct 
> >>>> f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> >>>>                  node = rb_next(&prev_dc->rb_node);
> >>>>                  next_dc = rb_entry_safe(node, struct discard_cmd, 
> >>>> rb_node);
> >>>>          }
> >>>> -
> >>>> -        mutex_unlock(&dcc->cmd_lock);
> >>>>  }
> >>>>  
> >>>>  static int __queue_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> >>>> @@ -1181,7 +1222,9 @@ static int __queue_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info 
> >>>> *sbi,
> >>>>  
> >>>>                  blkstart -= FDEV(devi).start_blk;
> >>>>          }
> >>>> +        mutex_lock(&SM_I(sbi)->dcc_info->cmd_lock);
> >>>>          __update_discard_tree_range(sbi, bdev, lblkstart, blkstart, 
> >>>> blklen);
> >>>> +        mutex_unlock(&SM_I(sbi)->dcc_info->cmd_lock);
> >>>>          return 0;
> >>>>  }
> >>>>  
> >>>> @@ -1220,9 +1263,9 @@ static unsigned int 
> >>>> __issue_discard_cmd_orderly(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> >>>>                  }
> >>>>  
> >>>>                  dcc->next_pos = dc->lstart + dc->len;
> >>>> -                __submit_discard_cmd(sbi, dpolicy, dc);
> >>>> +                __submit_discard_cmd(sbi, dpolicy, dc, &issued);
> >>>>  
> >>>> -                if (++issued >= dpolicy->max_requests)
> >>>> +                if (issued >= dpolicy->max_requests)
> >>>>                          break;
> >>>>  next:
> >>>>                  node = rb_next(&dc->rb_node);
> >>>> @@ -1277,9 +1320,9 @@ static int __issue_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info 
> >>>> *sbi,
> >>>>                                  break;
> >>>>                          }
> >>>>  
> >>>> -                        __submit_discard_cmd(sbi, dpolicy, dc);
> >>>> +                        __submit_discard_cmd(sbi, dpolicy, dc, &issued);
> >>>>  
> >>>> -                        if (++issued >= dpolicy->max_requests)
> >>>> +                        if (issued >= dpolicy->max_requests)
> >>>>                                  break;
> >>>>                  }
> >>>>                  blk_finish_plug(&plug);
> >>>> @@ -2475,9 +2518,9 @@ static unsigned int 
> >>>> __issue_discard_cmd_range(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> >>>>                          goto skip;
> >>>>                  }
> >>>>  
> >>>> -                __submit_discard_cmd(sbi, dpolicy, dc);
> >>>> +                __submit_discard_cmd(sbi, dpolicy, dc, &issued);
> >>>>  
> >>>> -                if (++issued >= dpolicy->max_requests) {
> >>>> +                if (issued >= dpolicy->max_requests) {
> >>>>                          start = dc->lstart + dc->len;
> >>>>  
> >>>>                          blk_finish_plug(&plug);
> >>>> -- 
> >>>> 2.16.2.17.g38e79b1fd

Reply via email to