On 2020-05-24 19:25, Wu, Hao wrote:
Hi Moritz and FPGA developers,
Is this OK? And if so, is it going into your git tree? Or should I
send it up through a different tree? (I'm new to the FPGA development
model).
I can take it, sorry for sluggish response.
That's great news, thanks Moritz! S
> >> Hi Moritz and FPGA developers,
> >>
> >> Is this OK? And if so, is it going into your git tree? Or should I
> >> send it up through a different tree? (I'm new to the FPGA development
> >> model).
> >
> > I can take it, sorry for sluggish response.
> >
>
> That's great news, thanks Moritz! Sor
On 2020-05-23 13:57, Moritz Fischer wrote:
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 06:52:34PM -0700, John Hubbard wrote:
On 2020-05-19 13:14, John Hubbard wrote:
This code was using get_user_pages_fast(), in a "Case 2" scenario
(DMA/RDMA), using the categorization from [1]. That means that it's
time to convert
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 06:52:34PM -0700, John Hubbard wrote:
> On 2020-05-19 13:14, John Hubbard wrote:
> > This code was using get_user_pages_fast(), in a "Case 2" scenario
> > (DMA/RDMA), using the categorization from [1]. That means that it's
> > time to convert the get_user_pages_fast() + put_
On 2020-05-19 13:14, John Hubbard wrote:
This code was using get_user_pages_fast(), in a "Case 2" scenario
(DMA/RDMA), using the categorization from [1]. That means that it's
time to convert the get_user_pages_fast() + put_page() calls to
pin_user_pages_fast() + unpin_user_pages() calls.
There i
This code was using get_user_pages_fast(), in a "Case 2" scenario
(DMA/RDMA), using the categorization from [1]. That means that it's
time to convert the get_user_pages_fast() + put_page() calls to
pin_user_pages_fast() + unpin_user_pages() calls.
There is some helpful background in [2]: basically
6 matches
Mail list logo