Re: [PATCH v2] iTCO_wdt: all versions count down twice

2017-04-18 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 06/04/2017 13:46, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 04/05/2017 04:41 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> The ICH9 is listed as having TCO v2, and indeed the behavior in the >> datasheet corresponds to v2 (for example the NO_REBOOT flag is >> accessible via the 16KiB-aligned Root Complex Base Address). >> >>

Re: [PATCH v2] iTCO_wdt: all versions count down twice

2017-04-18 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 06/04/2017 13:46, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 04/05/2017 04:41 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> The ICH9 is listed as having TCO v2, and indeed the behavior in the >> datasheet corresponds to v2 (for example the NO_REBOOT flag is >> accessible via the 16KiB-aligned Root Complex Base Address). >> >>

Re: [PATCH v2] iTCO_wdt: all versions count down twice

2017-04-06 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 04/05/2017 04:41 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: The ICH9 is listed as having TCO v2, and indeed the behavior in the datasheet corresponds to v2 (for example the NO_REBOOT flag is accessible via the 16KiB-aligned Root Complex Base Address). However, the TCO counts twice just like in v1; the

Re: [PATCH v2] iTCO_wdt: all versions count down twice

2017-04-06 Thread Guenter Roeck
On 04/05/2017 04:41 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: The ICH9 is listed as having TCO v2, and indeed the behavior in the datasheet corresponds to v2 (for example the NO_REBOOT flag is accessible via the 16KiB-aligned Root Complex Base Address). However, the TCO counts twice just like in v1; the

[PATCH v2] iTCO_wdt: all versions count down twice

2017-04-05 Thread Paolo Bonzini
The ICH9 is listed as having TCO v2, and indeed the behavior in the datasheet corresponds to v2 (for example the NO_REBOOT flag is accessible via the 16KiB-aligned Root Complex Base Address). However, the TCO counts twice just like in v1; the documentation of the SECOND_TO_STS bit says: "ICH9

[PATCH v2] iTCO_wdt: all versions count down twice

2017-04-05 Thread Paolo Bonzini
The ICH9 is listed as having TCO v2, and indeed the behavior in the datasheet corresponds to v2 (for example the NO_REBOOT flag is accessible via the 16KiB-aligned Root Complex Base Address). However, the TCO counts twice just like in v1; the documentation of the SECOND_TO_STS bit says: "ICH9