On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 09:39:07PM +0200, Michał Mirosław wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 09:12:14PM -0700, dmitry.torok...@gmail.com wrote:
> > The order in which 'users' counter is decremented vs calling drivers'
> > close() method is implementation specific, and we should not rely on
> > it.
On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 09:12:14PM -0700, dmitry.torok...@gmail.com wrote:
> The order in which 'users' counter is decremented vs calling drivers'
> close() method is implementation specific, and we should not rely on
> it. Let's introduce driver private flag and use it to signal ISR
> to exit
On Tue, 6 Oct 2020 at 06:12, wrote:
>
> The order in which 'users' counter is decremented vs calling drivers'
> close() method is implementation specific, and we should not rely on
> it. Let's introduce driver private flag and use it to signal ISR
> to exit when device is being closed.
>
> This
The order in which 'users' counter is decremented vs calling drivers'
close() method is implementation specific, and we should not rely on
it. Let's introduce driver private flag and use it to signal ISR
to exit when device is being closed.
This has a side-effect of fixing issue of accessing
4 matches
Mail list logo