On Monday 23 September 2013 02:27 PM, Arun Joseph wrote:
>
> On Sunday 22 September 2013 11:21 PM, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> El Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 01:25:42PM +0100 Jonathan Cameron ha dit:
>>
>>> On 09/16/13 22:17, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
The calculation of the old conversion t
On Sunday 22 September 2013 11:21 PM, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
Hi,
El Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 01:25:42PM +0100 Jonathan Cameron ha dit:
On 09/16/13 22:17, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
The calculation of the old conversion timeout value was based on the number of
steps used by this driver. This does
Hi,
El Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 01:25:42PM +0100 Jonathan Cameron ha dit:
> On 09/16/13 22:17, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> > The calculation of the old conversion timeout value was based on the number
> > of
> > steps used by this driver. This doesn't take into account that other steps
> > can be use
On 09/16/13 22:17, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> The calculation of the old conversion timeout value was based on the number of
> steps used by this driver. This doesn't take into account that other steps
> can be used by the touchscreen driver. Select the timeout value based on the
> steps used by bo
The calculation of the old conversion timeout value was based on the number of
steps used by this driver. This doesn't take into account that other steps
can be used by the touchscreen driver. Select the timeout value based on the
steps used by both drivers
Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke
---
d
5 matches
Mail list logo
