Initially the claim about no need for lock in brightness_show()
was valid as the function was just returning unchanged
LED brightness.

After the addition of led_update_brightness() this is no longer
true, as the function can change the brightness if a LED class
driver implements brightness_get op. It can lead to races between
led_update_brightness() and led_set_brightness().

Signed-off-by: Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszew...@samsung.com>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdego...@redhat.com>
Cc: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ai...@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pa...@ucw.cz>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <and...@lunn.ch>
---
Changes since v1:
- added led_sysfs_is_disabled() check
- moved sprintf under mutex protection

 drivers/leds/led-class.c | 18 +++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/leds/led-class.c b/drivers/leds/led-class.c
index b12f861..e472407 100644
--- a/drivers/leds/led-class.c
+++ b/drivers/leds/led-class.c
@@ -29,11 +29,23 @@ static ssize_t brightness_show(struct device *dev,
                struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
 {
        struct led_classdev *led_cdev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+       int ret;
 
-       /* no lock needed for this */
-       led_update_brightness(led_cdev);
+       mutex_lock(&led_cdev->led_access);
+
+       if (led_sysfs_is_disabled(led_cdev)) {
+               ret = -EBUSY;
+               goto unlock;
+       }
+
+       ret = led_update_brightness(led_cdev);
+       if (ret < 0)
+               goto unlock;
 
-       return sprintf(buf, "%u\n", led_cdev->brightness);
+       ret = sprintf(buf, "%u\n", led_cdev->brightness);
+unlock:
+       mutex_unlock(&led_cdev->led_access);
+       return ret;
 }
 
 static ssize_t brightness_store(struct device *dev,
-- 
1.9.1

Reply via email to