Reviewed-by: Steve Wahl
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 11:31:51AM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> From: Thomas Gleixner
>
> The usage of in_interrupt() in xpc_partition_disengaged() is clearly
> intended to avoid canceling the timeout timer when the function is invoked
> from the timer callb
From: Thomas Gleixner
The usage of in_interrupt() in xpc_partition_disengaged() is clearly
intended to avoid canceling the timeout timer when the function is invoked
from the timer callback.
While in_interrupt() is deprecated and ill defined as it does not provide
what the name suggests it catch
2 matches
Mail list logo
