On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Andrew Morton
wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 17:07:28 -0800 Danesh Petigara
> wrote:
>
>> On 2/27/2015 3:54 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> > On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 15:52:56 -0800 Danesh Petigara
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 2/27/2015 1:24 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> >>>
On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 17:07:28 -0800 Danesh Petigara
wrote:
> On 2/27/2015 3:54 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 15:52:56 -0800 Danesh Petigara
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 2/27/2015 1:24 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 24 Feb 2015 15:39:45 -0800 Danesh Petigara
> >>> wrote:
On 2/27/2015 3:54 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 15:52:56 -0800 Danesh Petigara
> wrote:
>
>> On 2/27/2015 1:24 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>> On Tue, 24 Feb 2015 15:39:45 -0800 Danesh Petigara
>>> wrote:
>>>
The CMA aligned offset calculation is incorrect for
non-zero
On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 15:52:56 -0800 Danesh Petigara
wrote:
> On 2/27/2015 1:24 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 Feb 2015 15:39:45 -0800 Danesh Petigara
> > wrote:
> >
> >> The CMA aligned offset calculation is incorrect for
> >> non-zero order_per_bit values.
> >>
> >> For example, if
On 2/27/2015 1:24 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Feb 2015 15:39:45 -0800 Danesh Petigara
> wrote:
>
>> The CMA aligned offset calculation is incorrect for
>> non-zero order_per_bit values.
>>
>> For example, if cma->order_per_bit=1, cma->base_pfn=
>> 0x2f80 and align_order=12, the
On Tue, 24 Feb 2015 15:39:45 -0800 Danesh Petigara
wrote:
> The CMA aligned offset calculation is incorrect for
> non-zero order_per_bit values.
>
> For example, if cma->order_per_bit=1, cma->base_pfn=
> 0x2f80 and align_order=12, the function returns
> a value of 0x17c00 instead of 0x400.
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Andrew Morton
a...@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 17:07:28 -0800 Danesh Petigara dpetig...@broadcom.com
wrote:
On 2/27/2015 3:54 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 15:52:56 -0800 Danesh Petigara
dpetig...@broadcom.com wrote:
On Tue, 24 Feb 2015 15:39:45 -0800 Danesh Petigara dpetig...@broadcom.com
wrote:
The CMA aligned offset calculation is incorrect for
non-zero order_per_bit values.
For example, if cma-order_per_bit=1, cma-base_pfn=
0x2f80 and align_order=12, the function returns
a value of 0x17c00
On 2/27/2015 1:24 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 24 Feb 2015 15:39:45 -0800 Danesh Petigara dpetig...@broadcom.com
wrote:
The CMA aligned offset calculation is incorrect for
non-zero order_per_bit values.
For example, if cma-order_per_bit=1, cma-base_pfn=
0x2f80 and align_order=12,
On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 15:52:56 -0800 Danesh Petigara dpetig...@broadcom.com
wrote:
On 2/27/2015 1:24 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 24 Feb 2015 15:39:45 -0800 Danesh Petigara dpetig...@broadcom.com
wrote:
The CMA aligned offset calculation is incorrect for
non-zero order_per_bit
On 2/27/2015 3:54 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 15:52:56 -0800 Danesh Petigara dpetig...@broadcom.com
wrote:
On 2/27/2015 1:24 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 24 Feb 2015 15:39:45 -0800 Danesh Petigara dpetig...@broadcom.com
wrote:
The CMA aligned offset calculation is
On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 17:07:28 -0800 Danesh Petigara dpetig...@broadcom.com
wrote:
On 2/27/2015 3:54 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 15:52:56 -0800 Danesh Petigara dpetig...@broadcom.com
wrote:
On 2/27/2015 1:24 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 24 Feb 2015 15:39:45 -0800
The CMA aligned offset calculation is incorrect for
non-zero order_per_bit values.
For example, if cma->order_per_bit=1, cma->base_pfn=
0x2f80 and align_order=12, the function returns
a value of 0x17c00 instead of 0x400.
This patch fixes the CMA aligned offset calculation.
Cc:
The CMA aligned offset calculation is incorrect for
non-zero order_per_bit values.
For example, if cma-order_per_bit=1, cma-base_pfn=
0x2f80 and align_order=12, the function returns
a value of 0x17c00 instead of 0x400.
This patch fixes the CMA aligned offset calculation.
Cc:
14 matches
Mail list logo