On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 09:57:47PM +0800, Jia He wrote:
> When we tested pmdk unit test [1] vmmalloc_fork TEST1 in arm64 guest, there
> will be a double page fault in __copy_from_user_inatomic of cow_user_page.
>
> Below call trace is from arm64 do_page_fault for debugging purpose
> [
On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 07:57:42AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 09:57:47PM +0800, Jia He wrote:
> > * This really shouldn't fail, because the page is there
> > * in the page tables. But it might just be unreadable,
> > * in which
On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 02:27:12PM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 09:57:47PM +0800, Jia He wrote:
> > + if (!pte_young(vmf->orig_pte)) {
> > + entry = pte_mkyoung(vmf->orig_pte);
> > + if (ptep_set_access_flags(vmf->vma,
On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 09:57:47PM +0800, Jia He wrote:
> + if (!pte_young(vmf->orig_pte)) {
> + entry = pte_mkyoung(vmf->orig_pte);
> + if (ptep_set_access_flags(vmf->vma, vmf->address,
> + vmf->pte, entry, 0))
> +
On Fri, Sep 06, 2019 at 09:57:47PM +0800, Jia He wrote:
>* This really shouldn't fail, because the page is there
>* in the page tables. But it might just be unreadable,
>* in which case we just give up and fill the result with
> - *
When we tested pmdk unit test [1] vmmalloc_fork TEST1 in arm64 guest, there
will be a double page fault in __copy_from_user_inatomic of cow_user_page.
Below call trace is from arm64 do_page_fault for debugging purpose
[ 110.016195] Call trace:
[ 110.016826] do_page_fault+0x5a4/0x690
[
6 matches
Mail list logo
