On 08.05.2015 [15:47:26 -0700], Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 06 May 2015 11:28:12 +0200 Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>
> > On 05/06/2015 12:09 AM, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > > On 03.04.2015 [10:45:56 -0700], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > >>> What I find somewhat worrying though is that we could
On Wed, 06 May 2015 11:28:12 +0200 Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 05/06/2015 12:09 AM, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > On 03.04.2015 [10:45:56 -0700], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> >>> What I find somewhat worrying though is that we could potentially
> >>> break the pfmemalloc_watermark_ok() test in
On Wed, 06 May 2015 11:28:12 +0200 Vlastimil Babka vba...@suse.cz wrote:
On 05/06/2015 12:09 AM, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
On 03.04.2015 [10:45:56 -0700], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
What I find somewhat worrying though is that we could potentially
break the pfmemalloc_watermark_ok() test
On 08.05.2015 [15:47:26 -0700], Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 06 May 2015 11:28:12 +0200 Vlastimil Babka vba...@suse.cz wrote:
On 05/06/2015 12:09 AM, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
On 03.04.2015 [10:45:56 -0700], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
What I find somewhat worrying though is that we
On 05/06/2015 12:09 AM, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
On 03.04.2015 [10:45:56 -0700], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
What I find somewhat worrying though is that we could potentially
break the pfmemalloc_watermark_ok() test in situations where
zone_reclaimable_pages(zone) == 0 is a transient situation
On 05/06/2015 12:09 AM, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
On 03.04.2015 [10:45:56 -0700], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
What I find somewhat worrying though is that we could potentially
break the pfmemalloc_watermark_ok() test in situations where
zone_reclaimable_pages(zone) == 0 is a transient situation
On 03.04.2015 [10:45:56 -0700], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> On 03.04.2015 [09:57:35 +0200], Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> > On 03/31/2015 11:48 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > >On Fri 27-03-15 15:23:50, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > >>On 27.03.2015 [13:17:59 -0700], Dave Hansen wrote:
> > >>>On
On 03.04.2015 [10:45:56 -0700], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
On 03.04.2015 [09:57:35 +0200], Vlastimil Babka wrote:
On 03/31/2015 11:48 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Fri 27-03-15 15:23:50, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
On 27.03.2015 [13:17:59 -0700], Dave Hansen wrote:
On 03/27/2015 12:28 PM,
On 03.04.2015 [20:24:45 +0200], Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 03-04-15 10:43:57, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > On 31.03.2015 [11:48:29 +0200], Michal Hocko wrote:
> [...]
> > > I would expect kswapd would be looping endlessly because the zone
> > > wouldn't be balanced obviously. But I would be
On Fri 03-04-15 10:43:57, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> On 31.03.2015 [11:48:29 +0200], Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
> > I would expect kswapd would be looping endlessly because the zone
> > wouldn't be balanced obviously. But I would be wrong... because
> > pgdat_balanced is doing this:
> >
On 03.04.2015 [09:57:35 +0200], Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 03/31/2015 11:48 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> >On Fri 27-03-15 15:23:50, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> >>On 27.03.2015 [13:17:59 -0700], Dave Hansen wrote:
> >>>On 03/27/2015 12:28 PM, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> @@ -2585,7 +2585,7 @@
On 31.03.2015 [11:48:29 +0200], Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 27-03-15 15:23:50, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > On 27.03.2015 [13:17:59 -0700], Dave Hansen wrote:
> > > On 03/27/2015 12:28 PM, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > > > @@ -2585,7 +2585,7 @@ static bool pfmemalloc_watermark_ok(pg_data_t
>
On 03/31/2015 11:48 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Fri 27-03-15 15:23:50, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
On 27.03.2015 [13:17:59 -0700], Dave Hansen wrote:
On 03/27/2015 12:28 PM, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
@@ -2585,7 +2585,7 @@ static bool pfmemalloc_watermark_ok(pg_data_t *pgdat)
for (i =
On 03/31/2015 11:48 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Fri 27-03-15 15:23:50, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
On 27.03.2015 [13:17:59 -0700], Dave Hansen wrote:
On 03/27/2015 12:28 PM, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
@@ -2585,7 +2585,7 @@ static bool pfmemalloc_watermark_ok(pg_data_t *pgdat)
for (i =
On 31.03.2015 [11:48:29 +0200], Michal Hocko wrote:
On Fri 27-03-15 15:23:50, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
On 27.03.2015 [13:17:59 -0700], Dave Hansen wrote:
On 03/27/2015 12:28 PM, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
@@ -2585,7 +2585,7 @@ static bool pfmemalloc_watermark_ok(pg_data_t
*pgdat)
On 03.04.2015 [20:24:45 +0200], Michal Hocko wrote:
On Fri 03-04-15 10:43:57, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
On 31.03.2015 [11:48:29 +0200], Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
I would expect kswapd would be looping endlessly because the zone
wouldn't be balanced obviously. But I would be wrong...
On Fri 03-04-15 10:43:57, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
On 31.03.2015 [11:48:29 +0200], Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
I would expect kswapd would be looping endlessly because the zone
wouldn't be balanced obviously. But I would be wrong... because
pgdat_balanced is doing this:
/*
On 03.04.2015 [09:57:35 +0200], Vlastimil Babka wrote:
On 03/31/2015 11:48 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Fri 27-03-15 15:23:50, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
On 27.03.2015 [13:17:59 -0700], Dave Hansen wrote:
On 03/27/2015 12:28 PM, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
@@ -2585,7 +2585,7 @@ static bool
On Fri 27-03-15 15:23:50, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> On 27.03.2015 [13:17:59 -0700], Dave Hansen wrote:
> > On 03/27/2015 12:28 PM, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > > @@ -2585,7 +2585,7 @@ static bool pfmemalloc_watermark_ok(pg_data_t
> > > *pgdat)
> > >
> > > for (i = 0; i <=
On Fri 27-03-15 15:23:50, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
On 27.03.2015 [13:17:59 -0700], Dave Hansen wrote:
On 03/27/2015 12:28 PM, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
@@ -2585,7 +2585,7 @@ static bool pfmemalloc_watermark_ok(pg_data_t
*pgdat)
for (i = 0; i = ZONE_NORMAL; i++) {
On 27.03.2015 [13:17:59 -0700], Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 03/27/2015 12:28 PM, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > @@ -2585,7 +2585,7 @@ static bool pfmemalloc_watermark_ok(pg_data_t *pgdat)
> >
> > for (i = 0; i <= ZONE_NORMAL; i++) {
> > zone = >node_zones[i];
> > -
On 27.03.2015 [13:17:59 -0700], Dave Hansen wrote:
On 03/27/2015 12:28 PM, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
@@ -2585,7 +2585,7 @@ static bool pfmemalloc_watermark_ok(pg_data_t *pgdat)
for (i = 0; i = ZONE_NORMAL; i++) {
zone = pgdat-node_zones[i];
- if
22 matches
Mail list logo