On 26 May 2016 at 14:30, Ludovic Desroches wrote:
> On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 09:28:56PM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>> On 20/05/2016 4:39 p.m., Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> > On 20 May 2016 at 13:46, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>> > > On 13/05/16 16:16,
On 26 May 2016 at 14:30, Ludovic Desroches wrote:
> On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 09:28:56PM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>> On 20/05/2016 4:39 p.m., Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> > On 20 May 2016 at 13:46, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>> > > On 13/05/16 16:16, Ludovic Desroches wrote:
>> > > > Activating wakeup event
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 09:28:56PM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 20/05/2016 4:39 p.m., Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > On 20 May 2016 at 13:46, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> > > On 13/05/16 16:16, Ludovic Desroches wrote:
> > > > Activating wakeup event is not enough to get a wakeup
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 09:28:56PM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 20/05/2016 4:39 p.m., Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > On 20 May 2016 at 13:46, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> > > On 13/05/16 16:16, Ludovic Desroches wrote:
> > > > Activating wakeup event is not enough to get a wakeup signal. The
> > > >
On 20/05/2016 4:39 p.m., Ulf Hansson wrote:
On 20 May 2016 at 13:46, Adrian Hunter wrote:
On 13/05/16 16:16, Ludovic Desroches wrote:
Activating wakeup event is not enough to get a wakeup signal. The
corresponding events have to be enabled in the Interrupt Status
On 20/05/2016 4:39 p.m., Ulf Hansson wrote:
On 20 May 2016 at 13:46, Adrian Hunter wrote:
On 13/05/16 16:16, Ludovic Desroches wrote:
Activating wakeup event is not enough to get a wakeup signal. The
corresponding events have to be enabled in the Interrupt Status Enable
Register too. It
On 20 May 2016 at 13:46, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 13/05/16 16:16, Ludovic Desroches wrote:
>> Activating wakeup event is not enough to get a wakeup signal. The
>> corresponding events have to be enabled in the Interrupt Status Enable
>> Register too. It follows the
On 20 May 2016 at 13:46, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 13/05/16 16:16, Ludovic Desroches wrote:
>> Activating wakeup event is not enough to get a wakeup signal. The
>> corresponding events have to be enabled in the Interrupt Status Enable
>> Register too. It follows the specification and is needed at
On 13/05/16 16:16, Ludovic Desroches wrote:
> Activating wakeup event is not enough to get a wakeup signal. The
> corresponding events have to be enabled in the Interrupt Status Enable
> Register too. It follows the specification and is needed at least by
> sdhci-of-at91.
>
> Signed-off-by:
On 13/05/16 16:16, Ludovic Desroches wrote:
> Activating wakeup event is not enough to get a wakeup signal. The
> corresponding events have to be enabled in the Interrupt Status Enable
> Register too. It follows the specification and is needed at least by
> sdhci-of-at91.
>
> Signed-off-by:
Activating wakeup event is not enough to get a wakeup signal. The
corresponding events have to be enabled in the Interrupt Status Enable
Register too. It follows the specification and is needed at least by
sdhci-of-at91.
Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches
---
Activating wakeup event is not enough to get a wakeup signal. The
corresponding events have to be enabled in the Interrupt Status Enable
Register too. It follows the specification and is needed at least by
sdhci-of-at91.
Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches
---
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 15
12 matches
Mail list logo