Hi Daniel,
Daniel Palmer wrote on Wed, 7 Apr 2021 21:01:01 +0900:
> Hi Miquel,
>
> On Wed, 7 Apr 2021 at 17:02, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > You may look at micron_8_ecc_get_status() helper to guide you. But
> > IMHO, if there are 0-3 bf, you should probably assume there were 3 bf
> > and return
Hi Miquel,
On Wed, 7 Apr 2021 at 17:02, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> You may look at micron_8_ecc_get_status() helper to guide you. But
> IMHO, if there are 0-3 bf, you should probably assume there were 3 bf
> and return 3, if there were 4, return 4, if it's uncorrectable return
> -EBADMSG otherwise
Hi Daniel,
Daniel Palmer wrote on Fri, 26 Mar 2021 23:09:28
+0900:
> Hi Miquel,
>
> Sorry for the constant pestering on this..
>
> On Tue, 23 Mar 2021 at 23:06, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > > # nandbiterrs -i /dev/mtd1
> > > incremental biterrors test
> > > Successfully corrected 0 bit errors
Hi Miquel,
Sorry for the constant pestering on this..
On Tue, 23 Mar 2021 at 23:06, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > # nandbiterrs -i /dev/mtd1
> > incremental biterrors test
> > Successfully corrected 0 bit errors per subpage
> > Inserted biterror @ 0/5
> > Read reported 4 corrected bit errors
> > ECC
Hi Miquel,
On Tue, 23 Mar 2021 at 23:06, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> >
> > # nandbiterrs -i /dev/mtd1
> > incremental biterrors test
> > Successfully corrected 0 bit errors per subpage
> > Inserted biterror @ 0/5
> > Read reported 4 corrected bit errors
> > ECC failure, invalid data despite read
Hi Daniel,
Daniel Palmer wrote on Tue, 23 Mar 2021 20:47:10
+0900:
> Hi Miquel,
>
> On Tue, 23 Mar 2021 at 19:32, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > You can run nandbiterrs -i /dev/mtdX
> >
> > You'll see if there is ECC correction or not (and its level).
>
> These are results I get for both of the
Hi Miquel,
On Tue, 23 Mar 2021 at 19:32, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> You can run nandbiterrs -i /dev/mtdX
>
> You'll see if there is ECC correction or not (and its level).
These are results I get for both of the nandbiterrs tests.
# nandbiterrs -i /dev/mtd1
incremental biterrors test
Successfully
Hi Daniel,
Daniel Palmer wrote on Tue, 23 Mar 2021 18:33:54
+0900:
> Hi Miquel,
>
> On Tue, 23 Mar 2021 at 03:32, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > > I think this shows that the datasheet is right in that the complete 64
> > > bytes of "spare area" is usable.
> > > I have no idea where it puts the ECC
Hi Miquel,
On Tue, 23 Mar 2021 at 03:32, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > I think this shows that the datasheet is right in that the complete 64
> > bytes of "spare area" is usable.
> > I have no idea where it puts the ECC though. :)
>
> Argh, I don't like when hardware tries to be smart.
I'm sort of
Hi Daniel,
Daniel Palmer wrote on Mon, 22 Mar 2021 21:44:40
+0900:
> Hi Miquel,
>
> Sorry for the resend. Gmail randomly switched to HTML email so the
> original version seems to have bounced.
>
> On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 at 20:16, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > > "2. Spare area 800H to 83FH is all
Hi Miquel,
Sorry for the resend. Gmail randomly switched to HTML email so the
original version seems to have bounced.
On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 at 20:16, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > "2. Spare area 800H to 83FH is all available for user.
> > ECC parity codes are programmed in
> > additional space and
Hi Miquel,
On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 at 20:16, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> But a changelog should always be added when you change something
> between two versions. And the changelog can be located below the three
> dashes ("---") without being part of the final commit message, it does
> not need to be in a
Hi Daniel,
Daniel Palmer wrote on Mon, 15 Feb 2021 19:53:13
+0900:
> Hi Miquel,
>
> On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 at 19:24, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> >
> > Can you please add a changelog here when you send a new version of a
> > patch?
>
> Sorry, I was going to add a cover letter but elsewhere got told
Hi Miquel,
On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 at 19:24, Miquel Raynal wrote:
>
> Can you please add a changelog here when you send a new version of a
> patch?
Sorry, I was going to add a cover letter but elsewhere got told that
one isn't needed for a single patch..
Basically I changed FS35ND01G to
Hi Daniel,
Daniel Palmer wrote on Sat, 13 Feb 2021 18:57:24
+0900:
> Add support for the Foresee FS35ND01G-S1Y2 manufactured by Longsys.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Palmer
>
> Link:
> https://datasheet.lcsc.com/szlcsc/2008121142_FORESEE-FS35ND01G-S1Y2QWFI000_C719495.pdf
> ---
Can you please
Add support for the Foresee FS35ND01G-S1Y2 manufactured by Longsys.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Palmer
Link:
https://datasheet.lcsc.com/szlcsc/2008121142_FORESEE-FS35ND01G-S1Y2QWFI000_C719495.pdf
---
drivers/mtd/nand/spi/Makefile | 2 +-
drivers/mtd/nand/spi/core.c| 1 +
16 matches
Mail list logo
