On Fri, 3 Oct 2014, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> I respect checkpatch.pl, and uniformity / consistency, but in this
> particular case I put my maintainer hat on and say that for this kernel
> subsystem it is fine, because the maintainer will be more efficient in
> maintaining this code when the code
On 3 October 2014 18:19, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-10-03 at 17:50 +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> On 3 October 2014 17:27, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
>> > Yes, I guess a single patch is indeed OK. I have few nit-picks, though.
>> >
>> > On Tue, 2014-09-30 at 18:13 +0300, Tanya Brokhman w
On Fri, 2014-10-03 at 17:50 +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> On 3 October 2014 17:27, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> > Yes, I guess a single patch is indeed OK. I have few nit-picks, though.
> >
> > On Tue, 2014-09-30 at 18:13 +0300, Tanya Brokhman wrote:
> >> - ubi_err("'ubi_io_read_ec_hdr()'
On 3 October 2014 17:27, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> Yes, I guess a single patch is indeed OK. I have few nit-picks, though.
>
> On Tue, 2014-09-30 at 18:13 +0300, Tanya Brokhman wrote:
>> - ubi_err("'ubi_io_read_ec_hdr()' returned unknown code %d",
>> err);
>> + ubi_err(ubi
Yes, I guess a single patch is indeed OK. I have few nit-picks, though.
On Tue, 2014-09-30 at 18:13 +0300, Tanya Brokhman wrote:
> - ubi_err("'ubi_io_read_ec_hdr()' returned unknown code %d", err);
> + ubi_err(ubi,
> + "'ubi_io_read_ec_hdr()' returned unknown
If there is more then one UBI device mounted, there is no way to
distinguish between messages from different UBI devices.
Add device number to all ubi layer message types.
Signed-off-by: Tanya Brokhman
---
Changes from V1:
- Compilation error fixed
- macros were updated to receive
6 matches
Mail list logo
