On Donnerstag, 18. Mai 2017 11:55:38 CEST Namhyung Kim wrote:
> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 10:38:22AM +0200, Milian Wolff wrote:
> > The very last inlined frame, i.e. the one furthest away from the
> > non-inlined frame, was silently dropped. This is apparent when
> > comparing the output of `perf
On Donnerstag, 18. Mai 2017 11:55:38 CEST Namhyung Kim wrote:
> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 10:38:22AM +0200, Milian Wolff wrote:
> > The very last inlined frame, i.e. the one furthest away from the
> > non-inlined frame, was silently dropped. This is apparent when
> > comparing the output of `perf
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 10:38:22AM +0200, Milian Wolff wrote:
> The very last inlined frame, i.e. the one furthest away from the
> non-inlined frame, was silently dropped. This is apparent when
> comparing the output of `perf script` and `addr2line`:
>
> ~~
> $ perf script --inline
> ...
>
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 10:38:22AM +0200, Milian Wolff wrote:
> The very last inlined frame, i.e. the one furthest away from the
> non-inlined frame, was silently dropped. This is apparent when
> comparing the output of `perf script` and `addr2line`:
>
> ~~
> $ perf script --inline
> ...
>
The very last inlined frame, i.e. the one furthest away from the
non-inlined frame, was silently dropped. This is apparent when
comparing the output of `perf script` and `addr2line`:
~~
$ perf script --inline
...
a.out 26722 80836.309329: 72425 cycles:
21493
The very last inlined frame, i.e. the one furthest away from the
non-inlined frame, was silently dropped. This is apparent when
comparing the output of `perf script` and `addr2line`:
~~
$ perf script --inline
...
a.out 26722 80836.309329: 72425 cycles:
21493
6 matches
Mail list logo