Em Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 12:42:46AM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> 2014-09-19 (금), 11:16 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo:
> > Em Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 03:26:25PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> > > On Fri, 12 Sep 2014 11:11:16 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > > Em Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 03
2014-09-19 (금), 11:16 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo:
> Em Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 03:26:25PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> > On Fri, 12 Sep 2014 11:11:16 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > Em Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 03:14:51PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> > >> On Fri, 5 Sep 2014 12:44:02
Em Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 03:26:25PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> On Fri, 12 Sep 2014 11:11:16 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 03:14:51PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> >> On Fri, 5 Sep 2014 12:44:02 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> >> > It seems we need
On Fri, 12 Sep 2014 11:11:16 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 03:14:51PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
>> On Fri, 5 Sep 2014 12:44:02 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>> > It seems we need a way to state that an entry in the build-id table is
>> > for the kerne
Em Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 03:14:51PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> On Fri, 5 Sep 2014 12:44:02 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > It seems we need a way to state that an entry in the build-id table is
> > for the kernel, without looking at its file name.
> Maybe we can add a new build_id2
On Mon, 8 Sep 2014 10:38:47 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Sun, Sep 07, 2014 at 10:24:12PM +0200, Stephane Eranian escreveu:
>> Can't you figure out it is from the kernel (in perf record) by remembering
>> you got the buildid from /sys/kernel/notes?
>
> Sure, the question was more abou
Hi Arnaldo,
On Fri, 5 Sep 2014 12:44:02 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Sat, Sep 06, 2014 at 12:16:40AM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
>> Hi Adrian and Arnaldo,
>>
>> 2014-09-05 (금), 11:11 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo:
>> > Em Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 10:22:40AM +0300, Adrian Hunter esc
Em Sun, Sep 07, 2014 at 10:24:12PM +0200, Stephane Eranian escreveu:
> On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 5:44 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
> wrote:
> > Em Sat, Sep 06, 2014 at 12:16:40AM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> >> Hi Adrian and Arnaldo,
> >>
> >> 2014-09-05 (금), 11:11 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo:
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 5:44 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
wrote:
> Em Sat, Sep 06, 2014 at 12:16:40AM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
>> Hi Adrian and Arnaldo,
>>
>> 2014-09-05 (금), 11:11 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo:
>> > Em Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 10:22:40AM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
>> > > On
Em Sat, Sep 06, 2014 at 12:16:40AM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> Hi Adrian and Arnaldo,
>
> 2014-09-05 (금), 11:11 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo:
> > Em Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 10:22:40AM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
> > > On 09/05/2014 07:59 AM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > > > +++ b/tools/perf/util
Hi Adrian and Arnaldo,
2014-09-05 (금), 11:11 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo:
> Em Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 10:22:40AM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
> > On 09/05/2014 07:59 AM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > > +++ b/tools/perf/util/machine.c
> > > @@ -1060,10 +1060,14 @@ static int
> > > machine__process_k
Em Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 10:22:40AM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
> On 09/05/2014 07:59 AM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/machine.c
> > @@ -1060,10 +1060,14 @@ static int
> > machine__process_kernel_mmap_event(struct machine *machine,
> > strlen(kmmap_pr
On 09/05/2014 07:59 AM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> There's a problem on finding correct kernel symbols when perf report
> runs on a different kernel. Although a part of the problem was solved
> by the prior commit 0a7e6d1b6844 ("perf tools: Check recorded kernel
> version when finding vmlinux"), there'
There's a problem on finding correct kernel symbols when perf report
runs on a different kernel. Although a part of the problem was solved
by the prior commit 0a7e6d1b6844 ("perf tools: Check recorded kernel
version when finding vmlinux"), there's a remaining problem still.
When perf records samp
14 matches
Mail list logo