On 10/18/2013 12:46 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 09:59:56AM -0700, Mike Dunn wrote:
>> Currently the driver assumes that the values specified in the
>> brightness-levels device tree property increase as they are parsed from
>> left to right. But boards that invert the
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 09:59:56AM -0700, Mike Dunn wrote:
> Currently the driver assumes that the values specified in the
> brightness-levels device tree property increase as they are parsed from
> left to right. But boards that invert the signal between the PWM output
> and the backlight will
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 09:59:56AM -0700, Mike Dunn wrote:
Currently the driver assumes that the values specified in the
brightness-levels device tree property increase as they are parsed from
left to right. But boards that invert the signal between the PWM output
and the backlight will need
On 10/18/2013 12:46 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 09:59:56AM -0700, Mike Dunn wrote:
Currently the driver assumes that the values specified in the
brightness-levels device tree property increase as they are parsed from
left to right. But boards that invert the signal
Hi Jingoo,
On Friday 27 September 2013 12:28:21 Jingoo Han wrote:
> On Thursday, September 26, 2013 9:08 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> > On 26/09/13 14:51, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 01:03:06PM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> > > [...]
> > >
> > >> But if you and Thierry
Hi Jingoo,
On Friday 27 September 2013 12:28:21 Jingoo Han wrote:
On Thursday, September 26, 2013 9:08 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
On 26/09/13 14:51, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 01:03:06PM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
[...]
But if you and Thierry think this version
On Thursday, September 26, 2013 9:08 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On 26/09/13 14:51, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 01:03:06PM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> > [...]
> >> But if you and Thierry think this version is good, I'll take it.
> >
> > That sounds like you want to take it
On Thursday, September 26, 2013 10:00 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 03:08:22PM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> > On 26/09/13 14:51, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 01:03:06PM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> > > [...]
> > >> But if you and Thierry think this
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 03:08:22PM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On 26/09/13 14:51, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 01:03:06PM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> > [...]
> >> But if you and Thierry think this version is good, I'll take it.
> >
> > That sounds like you want to take
On 26/09/13 14:51, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 01:03:06PM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> [...]
>> But if you and Thierry think this version is good, I'll take it.
>
> That sounds like you want to take it through the fbdev tree. Jingoo is
> listed (along with Richard, but he
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 01:03:06PM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
[...]
> But if you and Thierry think this version is good, I'll take it.
That sounds like you want to take it through the fbdev tree. Jingoo is
listed (along with Richard, but he hasn't been responsive to email for
years) as
On 22/09/13 19:59, Mike Dunn wrote:
> Currently the driver assumes that the values specified in the
> brightness-levels device tree property increase as they are parsed from
> left to right. But boards that invert the signal between the PWM output
> and the backlight will need to specify
On 22/09/13 19:59, Mike Dunn wrote:
Currently the driver assumes that the values specified in the
brightness-levels device tree property increase as they are parsed from
left to right. But boards that invert the signal between the PWM output
and the backlight will need to specify decreasing
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 01:03:06PM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
[...]
But if you and Thierry think this version is good, I'll take it.
That sounds like you want to take it through the fbdev tree. Jingoo is
listed (along with Richard, but he hasn't been responsive to email for
years) as
On 26/09/13 14:51, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 01:03:06PM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
[...]
But if you and Thierry think this version is good, I'll take it.
That sounds like you want to take it through the fbdev tree. Jingoo is
listed (along with Richard, but he hasn't
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 03:08:22PM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
On 26/09/13 14:51, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 01:03:06PM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
[...]
But if you and Thierry think this version is good, I'll take it.
That sounds like you want to take it through
On Thursday, September 26, 2013 10:00 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 03:08:22PM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
On 26/09/13 14:51, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 01:03:06PM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
[...]
But if you and Thierry think this version is
On Thursday, September 26, 2013 9:08 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
On 26/09/13 14:51, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 01:03:06PM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
[...]
But if you and Thierry think this version is good, I'll take it.
That sounds like you want to take it through the
Currently the driver assumes that the values specified in the
brightness-levels device tree property increase as they are parsed from
left to right. But boards that invert the signal between the PWM output
and the backlight will need to specify decreasing brightness-levels.
This patch removes the
Currently the driver assumes that the values specified in the
brightness-levels device tree property increase as they are parsed from
left to right. But boards that invert the signal between the PWM output
and the backlight will need to specify decreasing brightness-levels.
This patch removes the
20 matches
Mail list logo
