On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 07:01:04PM -0500, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> [Re: [PATCH v2] rcu: ensure kernel/rcu/rcu.h can be sourced/used stand-alone]
> On 23/02/2014 (Sun 09:27) Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 01:00:39AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > &
[Re: [PATCH v2] rcu: ensure kernel/rcu/rcu.h can be sourced/used stand-alone]
On 23/02/2014 (Sun 09:27) Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 01:00:39AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 09:02:13PM -0500, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> > > [
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 01:00:39AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 09:02:13PM -0500, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> > [Re: [PATCH v2] rcu: ensure kernel/rcu/rcu.h can be sourced/used
> > stand-alone] On 19/02/2014 (Wed 17:53) Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 01:00:39AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 09:02:13PM -0500, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
[Re: [PATCH v2] rcu: ensure kernel/rcu/rcu.h can be sourced/used
stand-alone] On 19/02/2014 (Wed 17:53) Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 02
[Re: [PATCH v2] rcu: ensure kernel/rcu/rcu.h can be sourced/used stand-alone]
On 23/02/2014 (Sun 09:27) Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 01:00:39AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 09:02:13PM -0500, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
[Re: [PATCH v2] rcu: ensure
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 07:01:04PM -0500, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
[Re: [PATCH v2] rcu: ensure kernel/rcu/rcu.h can be sourced/used stand-alone]
On 23/02/2014 (Sun 09:27) Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 01:00:39AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 09:02
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 09:02:13PM -0500, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> [Re: [PATCH v2] rcu: ensure kernel/rcu/rcu.h can be sourced/used stand-alone]
> On 19/02/2014 (Wed 17:53) Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 02:33:27PM -0500, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> >
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 09:02:13PM -0500, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
[Re: [PATCH v2] rcu: ensure kernel/rcu/rcu.h can be sourced/used stand-alone]
On 19/02/2014 (Wed 17:53) Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 02:33:27PM -0500, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
The kbuild test bot uncovered
[Re: [PATCH v2] rcu: ensure kernel/rcu/rcu.h can be sourced/used stand-alone]
On 19/02/2014 (Wed 17:53) Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 02:33:27PM -0500, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> > The kbuild test bot uncovered an implicit dependence on the
> > trace header being
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 02:33:27PM -0500, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> The kbuild test bot uncovered an implicit dependence on the
> trace header being present before rcu.h in ia64 allmodconfig
> that looks like this:
>
> In file included from kernel/ksysfs.c:22:0:
> kernel/rcu/rcu.h: In function
The kbuild test bot uncovered an implicit dependence on the
trace header being present before rcu.h in ia64 allmodconfig
that looks like this:
In file included from kernel/ksysfs.c:22:0:
kernel/rcu/rcu.h: In function '__rcu_reclaim':
kernel/rcu/rcu.h:107:3: error: implicit declaration of function
The kbuild test bot uncovered an implicit dependence on the
trace header being present before rcu.h in ia64 allmodconfig
that looks like this:
In file included from kernel/ksysfs.c:22:0:
kernel/rcu/rcu.h: In function '__rcu_reclaim':
kernel/rcu/rcu.h:107:3: error: implicit declaration of function
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 02:33:27PM -0500, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
The kbuild test bot uncovered an implicit dependence on the
trace header being present before rcu.h in ia64 allmodconfig
that looks like this:
In file included from kernel/ksysfs.c:22:0:
kernel/rcu/rcu.h: In function
[Re: [PATCH v2] rcu: ensure kernel/rcu/rcu.h can be sourced/used stand-alone]
On 19/02/2014 (Wed 17:53) Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 02:33:27PM -0500, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
The kbuild test bot uncovered an implicit dependence on the
trace header being present before rcu.h
14 matches
Mail list logo
