Hi Mike,
On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 11:00 PM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-08-19 at 10:58 -0700, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>>
>> > Ok, I gotta ask: In order to fix what? What exactly does the small
>> > but existent overhead increase buy us other than an ever so slightly
>> > different chart?
On Sat, 2017-08-19 at 10:58 -0700, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>
> > Ok, I gotta ask: In order to fix what? What exactly does the small
> > but existent overhead increase buy us other than an ever so slightly
> > different chart? What is your motivation to care about a microscopic
> > change in signa
Hi Mike,
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 9:57 PM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-08-18 at 16:50 -0700, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>> The PELT signal (sa->load_avg and sa->util_avg) are not updated if the amount
>> accumulated during a single update doesn't cross a period boundary. This is
>> fine in cas
On Fri, 2017-08-18 at 16:50 -0700, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> The PELT signal (sa->load_avg and sa->util_avg) are not updated if the amount
> accumulated during a single update doesn't cross a period boundary. This is
> fine in cases where the amount accrued is much smaller than the size of a
> single
The PELT signal (sa->load_avg and sa->util_avg) are not updated if the amount
accumulated during a single update doesn't cross a period boundary. This is
fine in cases where the amount accrued is much smaller than the size of a
single PELT window (1ms) however if the amount accrued is high then the
5 matches
Mail list logo
