On 10/12/2017 10:44 PM, Steve Muckle wrote:
> When creating a pathname close to PATH_MAX to test execveat, factor in
> the current working directory path otherwise we end up with an absolute
> path that is longer than PATH_MAX. While execveat() may succeed, subsequent
> calls to the kernel from
On 10/12/2017 10:44 PM, Steve Muckle wrote:
> When creating a pathname close to PATH_MAX to test execveat, factor in
> the current working directory path otherwise we end up with an absolute
> path that is longer than PATH_MAX. While execveat() may succeed, subsequent
> calls to the kernel from
When creating a pathname close to PATH_MAX to test execveat, factor in
the current working directory path otherwise we end up with an absolute
path that is longer than PATH_MAX. While execveat() may succeed, subsequent
calls to the kernel from the runtime environment which are required to
When creating a pathname close to PATH_MAX to test execveat, factor in
the current working directory path otherwise we end up with an absolute
path that is longer than PATH_MAX. While execveat() may succeed, subsequent
calls to the kernel from the runtime environment which are required to
4 matches
Mail list logo