On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 10:38:15AM +0200, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + err_clk:
> > + clk_unprepare(data->clk);
> > + err_free_clk:
> > + devm_clk_put(>dev, data->clk);
> > + err_free:
> > + devm_kfree(>dev, data);
>
> And there labels could be dropped.
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 01:09:31PM +0400, Sergei Ianovich wrote:
> pxa2xx-uart was a separate uart platform driver. It was declaring
> the same device names and numbers as 8250 driver. As a result,
> it was impossible to use 8250 driver on PXA SoCs.
>
> Upon closer examination pxa2xx-uart
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 01:09:31PM +0400, Sergei Ianovich wrote:
pxa2xx-uart was a separate uart platform driver. It was declaring
the same device names and numbers as 8250 driver. As a result,
it was impossible to use 8250 driver on PXA SoCs.
Upon closer examination pxa2xx-uart turned
On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 10:38:15AM +0200, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
Hi,
+ return 0;
+
+ err_clk:
+ clk_unprepare(data-clk);
+ err_free_clk:
+ devm_clk_put(pdev-dev, data-clk);
+ err_free:
+ devm_kfree(pdev-dev, data);
And there labels could be dropped.
This should
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 01:09:31PM +0400, Sergei Ianovich wrote:
> pxa2xx-uart was a separate uart platform driver. It was declaring
> the same device names and numbers as 8250 driver. As a result,
> it was impossible to use 8250 driver on PXA SoCs.
>
> Upon closer examination pxa2xx-uart turned
pxa2xx-uart was a separate uart platform driver. It was declaring
the same device names and numbers as 8250 driver. As a result,
it was impossible to use 8250 driver on PXA SoCs.
Upon closer examination pxa2xx-uart turned out to be a clone of
8250_core driver.
Workaround for Erratum #19
pxa2xx-uart was a separate uart platform driver. It was declaring
the same device names and numbers as 8250 driver. As a result,
it was impossible to use 8250 driver on PXA SoCs.
Upon closer examination pxa2xx-uart turned out to be a clone of
8250_core driver.
Workaround for Erratum #19
On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 01:09:31PM +0400, Sergei Ianovich wrote:
pxa2xx-uart was a separate uart platform driver. It was declaring
the same device names and numbers as 8250 driver. As a result,
it was impossible to use 8250 driver on PXA SoCs.
Upon closer examination pxa2xx-uart turned out
8 matches
Mail list logo