On Wed, 27 Feb 2013, Glauber Costa wrote:
> You can apply this one as-is with Christoph's ACK.
Right.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
On 02/27/2013 11:47 AM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 7:23 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
>> On Fri, 22 Feb 2013, Glauber Costa wrote:
>>
>>> On 02/22/2013 09:01 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
Argh. This one was the final version:
On 02/27/2013 11:47 AM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 7:23 PM, Christoph Lameter c...@linux.com wrote:
On Fri, 22 Feb 2013, Glauber Costa wrote:
On 02/22/2013 09:01 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
Argh. This one was the final version:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2009521/
On Wed, 27 Feb 2013, Glauber Costa wrote:
You can apply this one as-is with Christoph's ACK.
Right.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 7:23 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Feb 2013, Glauber Costa wrote:
>
>> On 02/22/2013 09:01 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
>> > Argh. This one was the final version:
>> >
>> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2009521/
>> >
>>
>> It seems it would work. It is all
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 7:23 PM, Christoph Lameter c...@linux.com wrote:
On Fri, 22 Feb 2013, Glauber Costa wrote:
On 02/22/2013 09:01 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
Argh. This one was the final version:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2009521/
It seems it would work. It is all the
Hello, Christoph.
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 12:35:22AM +, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Feb 2013, JoonSoo Kim wrote:
>
> > With flushing, deactivate_slab() occur and it has some overhead to
> > deactivate objects.
> > If my patch properly fix this situation, it is better to use mine
>
Hello, Christoph.
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 12:35:22AM +, Christoph Lameter wrote:
On Sat, 23 Feb 2013, JoonSoo Kim wrote:
With flushing, deactivate_slab() occur and it has some overhead to
deactivate objects.
If my patch properly fix this situation, it is better to use mine
which
On Sat, 23 Feb 2013, JoonSoo Kim wrote:
> With flushing, deactivate_slab() occur and it has some overhead to
> deactivate objects.
> If my patch properly fix this situation, it is better to use mine
> which has no overhead.
Well this occurs during boot and its not that performance critical.
--
On Sat, 23 Feb 2013, JoonSoo Kim wrote:
With flushing, deactivate_slab() occur and it has some overhead to
deactivate objects.
If my patch properly fix this situation, it is better to use mine
which has no overhead.
Well this occurs during boot and its not that performance critical.
--
To
2013/2/23 Christoph Lameter :
> On Fri, 22 Feb 2013, Glauber Costa wrote:
>
>> On 02/22/2013 09:01 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
>> > Argh. This one was the final version:
>> >
>> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2009521/
>> >
>>
>> It seems it would work. It is all the same to me.
>> Which one
On Fri, 22 Feb 2013, Glauber Costa wrote:
> On 02/22/2013 09:01 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > Argh. This one was the final version:
> >
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2009521/
> >
>
> It seems it would work. It is all the same to me.
> Which one do you prefer?
Flushing seems to be
On 02/22/2013 09:01 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> Argh. This one was the final version:
>
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2009521/
>
It seems it would work. It is all the same to me.
Which one do you prefer?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
Argh. This one was the final version:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2009521/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the
An earlier fix to this is available here:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1975301/
and
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/1/15/55
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
On Fri, 22 Feb 2013, Glauber Costa wrote:
> After we create a boot cache, we may allocate from it until it is bootstraped.
> This will move the page from the partial list to the cpu slab list. If this
> happens, the loop:
Acked-by: Christoph Lameter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
After we create a boot cache, we may allocate from it until it is bootstraped.
This will move the page from the partial list to the cpu slab list. If this
happens, the loop:
list_for_each_entry(p, >partial, lru)
that we use to scan for all partial pages will yield nothing, and the pages
After we create a boot cache, we may allocate from it until it is bootstraped.
This will move the page from the partial list to the cpu slab list. If this
happens, the loop:
list_for_each_entry(p, n-partial, lru)
that we use to scan for all partial pages will yield nothing, and the pages
On Fri, 22 Feb 2013, Glauber Costa wrote:
After we create a boot cache, we may allocate from it until it is bootstraped.
This will move the page from the partial list to the cpu slab list. If this
happens, the loop:
Acked-by: Christoph Lameter c...@linux.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list:
An earlier fix to this is available here:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1975301/
and
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/1/15/55
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
Argh. This one was the final version:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2009521/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ
On 02/22/2013 09:01 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
Argh. This one was the final version:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2009521/
It seems it would work. It is all the same to me.
Which one do you prefer?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the
On Fri, 22 Feb 2013, Glauber Costa wrote:
On 02/22/2013 09:01 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
Argh. This one was the final version:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2009521/
It seems it would work. It is all the same to me.
Which one do you prefer?
Flushing seems to be simpler and
2013/2/23 Christoph Lameter c...@linux.com:
On Fri, 22 Feb 2013, Glauber Costa wrote:
On 02/22/2013 09:01 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
Argh. This one was the final version:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2009521/
It seems it would work. It is all the same to me.
Which one do you
24 matches
Mail list logo
