At Thu, 01 Jan 2015 10:38:55 +1300,
Eliot Blennerhassett wrote:
>
> >>> More code changes may land in near future, so removing functions isn't
> >>> good at all at this moment. We need to wait until the all things are
> >>> settled down. IOW, forget about this for a while :)
>
> Hi Richard,
At Thu, 01 Jan 2015 10:38:55 +1300,
Eliot Blennerhassett wrote:
>
> >>> More code changes may land in near future, so removing functions isn't
> >>> good at all at this moment. We need to wait until the all things are
> >>> settled down. IOW, forget about this for a while :)
>
> Hi Richard,
At Thu, 01 Jan 2015 10:38:55 +1300,
Eliot Blennerhassett wrote:
More code changes may land in near future, so removing functions isn't
good at all at this moment. We need to wait until the all things are
settled down. IOW, forget about this for a while :)
Hi Richard, Takashi,
In
At Thu, 01 Jan 2015 10:38:55 +1300,
Eliot Blennerhassett wrote:
More code changes may land in near future, so removing functions isn't
good at all at this moment. We need to wait until the all things are
settled down. IOW, forget about this for a while :)
Hi Richard, Takashi,
In
>>> More code changes may land in near future, so removing functions isn't
>>> good at all at this moment. We need to wait until the all things are
>>> settled down. IOW, forget about this for a while :)
Hi Richard, Takashi,
In principle I don't object to this patch (thanks for the work
At Wed, 31 Dec 2014 18:07:36 +0100,
Rickard Strandqvist wrote:
>
> 2014-12-31 17:45 GMT+01:00 Takashi Iwai :
>
> > At Wed, 31 Dec 2014 17:41:33 +0100,
> > Rickard Strandqvist wrote:
> > >
> > > 2014-12-31 17:07 GMT+01:00 Takashi Iwai :
> > >
> > > > At Wed, 31 Dec 2014 16:17:02 +0100,
> > > >
At Wed, 31 Dec 2014 17:41:33 +0100,
Rickard Strandqvist wrote:
>
> 2014-12-31 17:07 GMT+01:00 Takashi Iwai :
>
> > At Wed, 31 Dec 2014 16:17:02 +0100,
> > Rickard Strandqvist wrote:
> > >
> > > Removes some functions that are not used anywhere:
> >
> > See Eliot's previous reply. There will be
At Wed, 31 Dec 2014 16:17:02 +0100,
Rickard Strandqvist wrote:
>
> Removes some functions that are not used anywhere:
See Eliot's previous reply. There will be some code changes, so this
action is no-go as of now.
thanks,
Takashi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
Removes some functions that are not used anywhere:
hpi_stream_response_to_legacy() hpi_outstream_host_buffer_free()
hpi_outstream_host_buffer_get_info() hpi_outstream_host_buffer_allocate()
hpi_outstream_set_time_scale() hpi_outstream_ancillary_read()
hpi_outstream_ancillary_get_info()
At Wed, 31 Dec 2014 16:17:02 +0100,
Rickard Strandqvist wrote:
Removes some functions that are not used anywhere:
See Eliot's previous reply. There will be some code changes, so this
action is no-go as of now.
thanks,
Takashi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
At Wed, 31 Dec 2014 17:41:33 +0100,
Rickard Strandqvist wrote:
2014-12-31 17:07 GMT+01:00 Takashi Iwai ti...@suse.de:
At Wed, 31 Dec 2014 16:17:02 +0100,
Rickard Strandqvist wrote:
Removes some functions that are not used anywhere:
See Eliot's previous reply. There will be some
At Wed, 31 Dec 2014 18:07:36 +0100,
Rickard Strandqvist wrote:
2014-12-31 17:45 GMT+01:00 Takashi Iwai ti...@suse.de:
At Wed, 31 Dec 2014 17:41:33 +0100,
Rickard Strandqvist wrote:
2014-12-31 17:07 GMT+01:00 Takashi Iwai ti...@suse.de:
At Wed, 31 Dec 2014 16:17:02 +0100,
More code changes may land in near future, so removing functions isn't
good at all at this moment. We need to wait until the all things are
settled down. IOW, forget about this for a while :)
Hi Richard, Takashi,
In principle I don't object to this patch (thanks for the work Richard),
but
Removes some functions that are not used anywhere:
hpi_stream_response_to_legacy() hpi_outstream_host_buffer_free()
hpi_outstream_host_buffer_get_info() hpi_outstream_host_buffer_allocate()
hpi_outstream_set_time_scale() hpi_outstream_ancillary_read()
hpi_outstream_ancillary_get_info()
14 matches
Mail list logo
