On 06/11/2020 10:22, zhuguangqin...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Zhuguangqing
>
> If state has not changed successfully and we updated cpufreq_state,
> next time when the new state is equal to cpufreq_state (not changed
> successfully last time), we will return directly and miss a
>
On 06-11-20, 17:22, zhuguangqin...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Zhuguangqing
>
> If state has not changed successfully and we updated cpufreq_state,
> next time when the new state is equal to cpufreq_state (not changed
> successfully last time), we will return directly and miss a
>
From: Zhuguangqing
If state has not changed successfully and we updated cpufreq_state,
next time when the new state is equal to cpufreq_state (not changed
successfully last time), we will return directly and miss a
freq_qos_update_request() that should have been.
Fixes: 5130802ddbb1 ("thermal:
3 matches
Mail list logo