On Mon, 30 Sep 2024 19:03:52 +0200 Aleksandr Mikhalitsyn wrote:
> > At this point my question is, should we solve the problem higher and
> > show all the modules in /sys/modules, either way?
>
> Probably, yes. We can ask Luis Chamberlain's opinion on this one.
>
> +cc Luis Chamberlain
>
> >
>
> > >Hi Stefano,
> > >
> > >>
> > >> I was looking at other commits to see how versioning is handled in order
> > >> to make sense (e.g. using the same version of the kernel), and I saw
> > >> many commits that are removing MODULE_VERSION because they say it
> > >> doesn't make sense in in-tree mod
On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 5:43 PM Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>
> Hi Aleksandr,
>
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 04:43:36PM GMT, Aleksandr Mikhalitsyn wrote:
> >On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 4:27 PM Stefano Garzarella
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 08:21:03PM GMT, Alexander Mikhalitsyn wrote:
> >>
Hi Aleksandr,
On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 04:43:36PM GMT, Aleksandr Mikhalitsyn wrote:
On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 4:27 PM Stefano Garzarella
wrote:
On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 08:21:03PM GMT, Alexander Mikhalitsyn wrote:
>Add an explicit MODULE_VERSION("0.0.1") specification for the vhost_vsock
module.
On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 4:27 PM Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 08:21:03PM GMT, Alexander Mikhalitsyn wrote:
> >Add an explicit MODULE_VERSION("0.0.1") specification for the vhost_vsock
> >module.
> >
> >It is useful because it allows userspace to check if vhost_vsock is the
On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 4:05 PM Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 02:28:30PM +0200, Aleksandr Mikhalitsyn wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 9:03 PM Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 08:21:03PM +0200, Alexander Mikhalitsyn wrote:
> > > > Add an expl
On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 08:21:03PM GMT, Alexander Mikhalitsyn wrote:
Add an explicit MODULE_VERSION("0.0.1") specification for the vhost_vsock
module.
It is useful because it allows userspace to check if vhost_vsock is there when
it is
configured as a built-in.
This is what we have *without*
On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 02:28:30PM +0200, Aleksandr Mikhalitsyn wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 9:03 PM Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 08:21:03PM +0200, Alexander Mikhalitsyn wrote:
> > > Add an explicit MODULE_VERSION("0.0.1") specification for the vhost_vsock
> > > m
On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 9:03 PM Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 08:21:03PM +0200, Alexander Mikhalitsyn wrote:
> > Add an explicit MODULE_VERSION("0.0.1") specification for the vhost_vsock
> > module.
> >
> > It is useful because it allows userspace to check if vhost_vsock i
On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 08:21:03PM +0200, Alexander Mikhalitsyn wrote:
> Add an explicit MODULE_VERSION("0.0.1") specification for the vhost_vsock
> module.
>
> It is useful because it allows userspace to check if vhost_vsock is there
> when it is
> configured as a built-in.
>
> This is what we
Add an explicit MODULE_VERSION("0.0.1") specification for the vhost_vsock
module.
It is useful because it allows userspace to check if vhost_vsock is there when
it is
configured as a built-in.
This is what we have *without* this change and when vhost_vsock is configured
as a module and loaded:
11 matches
Mail list logo