Hi Greg,
Exactly as Jean-Francois stated:
> Mariusz can chime in but I believe although it was the same exercise
> that led to his discoveries, each patch can stand alone and be applied
> in any order.
>
> I will send a v3 without a reply-to-id. Mariusz' patch "[PATCH v2] w1:
> fix the resume com
** resending to list only because of bounce **
Hi Greg,
> On Mar 27, 2019, at 12:53, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 11:18:27AM -0400, Jean-Francois Dagenais wrote:
>> Originally
>> Reported-by: Mariusz Bialonczyk
>
> That needs to go down in the signed-off-by area.
No
On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 11:18:27AM -0400, Jean-Francois Dagenais wrote:
> Originally
> Reported-by: Mariusz Bialonczyk
That needs to go down in the signed-off-by area.
Also, please resend this series in a way that I can apply it. You
didn't say what the order was for the v2 patches.
thanks,
g
Originally
Reported-by: Mariusz Bialonczyk
When we have success in 'Channel Access Write' but reading back latch
states fails, a write is retried without doing a proper slave reset.
This leads to protocol errors as the slave treats the next 'Channel
Access Write' as the continuation of previous c
4 matches
Mail list logo