Re: [PATCH v2] x86/apic/vector: Move pr_warn() out of vector_lock

2021-03-30 Thread Petr Mladek
On Sun 2021-03-28 20:52:36, Waiman Long wrote: > It was found that the following circular locking dependency warning > could happen in some systems: > > [ 218.097878] == > [ 218.097879] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected >

Re: [PATCH v2] x86/apic/vector: Move pr_warn() out of vector_lock

2021-03-29 Thread Thomas Gleixner
Waiman, On Mon, Mar 29 2021 at 15:57, Waiman Long wrote: > On 3/29/21 8:42 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> On Sun, Mar 28 2021 at 20:52, Waiman Long wrote: >>> It was found that the following circular locking dependency warning >>> could happen in some systems: >>> >>> [ 218.097878]

Re: [PATCH v2] x86/apic/vector: Move pr_warn() out of vector_lock

2021-03-29 Thread Waiman Long
On 3/29/21 8:42 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: Waiman, On Sun, Mar 28 2021 at 20:52, Waiman Long wrote: It was found that the following circular locking dependency warning could happen in some systems: [ 218.097878] == [ 218.097879] WARNING:

Re: [PATCH v2] x86/apic/vector: Move pr_warn() out of vector_lock

2021-03-29 Thread Thomas Gleixner
Waiman, On Sun, Mar 28 2021 at 20:52, Waiman Long wrote: > It was found that the following circular locking dependency warning > could happen in some systems: > > [ 218.097878] == > [ 218.097879] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency

[PATCH v2] x86/apic/vector: Move pr_warn() out of vector_lock

2021-03-28 Thread Waiman Long
It was found that the following circular locking dependency warning could happen in some systems: [ 218.097878] == [ 218.097879] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 218.097880] 4.18.0-228.el8.x86_64+debug #1 Not tainted [