* Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Aug 2016, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > > ENTRY(__sw_hweight64)
> > > -#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> > > +
> >
> > So this removes an #ifdef without removing the #else branch.
>
> Hi Ingo,
>
> this patch is obsolete; the real issue has already been
* Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Aug 2016, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > > ENTRY(__sw_hweight64)
> > > -#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> > > +
> >
> > So this removes an #ifdef without removing the #else branch.
>
> Hi Ingo,
>
> this patch is obsolete; the real issue has already been fixed by 65ea11ec6
* Jiri Kosina wrote:
> ENTRY(__sw_hweight64)
> -#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> +
So this removes an #ifdef without removing the #else branch.
Help?
Thanks,
Ingo
* Jiri Kosina wrote:
> ENTRY(__sw_hweight64)
> -#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> +
So this removes an #ifdef without removing the #else branch.
Help?
Thanks,
Ingo
On Wed, 10 Aug 2016, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > ENTRY(__sw_hweight64)
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> > +
>
> So this removes an #ifdef without removing the #else branch.
Hi Ingo,
this patch is obsolete; the real issue has already been fixed by 65ea11ec6
("x86/hweight: Don't clobber %rdi") in Linus'
On Wed, 10 Aug 2016, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > ENTRY(__sw_hweight64)
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> > +
>
> So this removes an #ifdef without removing the #else branch.
Hi Ingo,
this patch is obsolete; the real issue has already been fixed by 65ea11ec6
("x86/hweight: Don't clobber %rdi") in Linus'
On Mon, 8 Aug 2016, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > Okay, scratch this thread, it's been just covered (and Linus already
> > applied it) in
> >
> >
> > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1470677729-10561-1-git-send-email-ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com
>
> Can you confirm it fixes the issue on your
On Mon, 8 Aug 2016, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > Okay, scratch this thread, it's been just covered (and Linus already
> > applied it) in
> >
> >
> > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1470677729-10561-1-git-send-email-ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com
>
> Can you confirm it fixes the issue on your
On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 08:48:44PM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> Okay, scratch this thread, it's been just covered (and Linus already
> applied it) in
>
>
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1470677729-10561-1-git-send-email-ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com
Can you confirm it fixes the issue on your
On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 08:48:44PM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> Okay, scratch this thread, it's been just covered (and Linus already
> applied it) in
>
>
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1470677729-10561-1-git-send-email-ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com
Can you confirm it fixes the issue on your
Okay, scratch this thread, it's been just covered (and Linus already
applied it) in
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1470677729-10561-1-git-send-email-ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
Okay, scratch this thread, it's been just covered (and Linus already
applied it) in
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1470677729-10561-1-git-send-email-ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
Hi Jiri,
[auto build test ERROR on tip/auto-latest]
[also build test ERROR on v4.8-rc1 next-20160808]
[cannot apply to tip/x86/core]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
Hi Jiri,
[auto build test ERROR on tip/auto-latest]
[also build test ERROR on v4.8-rc1 next-20160808]
[cannot apply to tip/x86/core]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
From: Jiri Kosina
The open-coded version of __sw_hweight32() and __sw_hweight64() are
broken; the variable <-> register mapping in the comments doesn't match
the registers being used, resulting in wrong calculations.
This has a potential to demonstrate itself by various
From: Jiri Kosina
The open-coded version of __sw_hweight32() and __sw_hweight64() are
broken; the variable <-> register mapping in the comments doesn't match
the registers being used, resulting in wrong calculations.
This has a potential to demonstrate itself by various syptoms on machines
16 matches
Mail list logo