Re: [PATCH v2] x86/irq: Add additional unhandled IRQ debug information

2016-12-08 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Tue, 6 Dec 2016, Prarit Bhargava wrote: > The current unhandled IRQ warning doesn't output enough information on x86 to > determine which device issued an interrupt. For example, > > irq 16: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option) > CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.9.0

[PATCH v2] x86/irq: Add additional unhandled IRQ debug information

2016-12-06 Thread Prarit Bhargava
The current unhandled IRQ warning doesn't output enough information on x86 to determine which device issued an interrupt. For example, irq 16: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option) CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.9.0-rc6+ #19 Hardware name: Hewlett-Packard HP Z820 Works