On Tue 28-11-17 08:39:19, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 10:35:51AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
> > Are you going to apply the patch or should I re-send it with
> > acks/reviewed-by?
>
> I injected all of those when I added the patch to my tree:
>
> Noticed-by: Tetsuo
On Tue 28-11-17 08:39:19, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 10:35:51AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
> > Are you going to apply the patch or should I re-send it with
> > acks/reviewed-by?
>
> I injected all of those when I added the patch to my tree:
>
> Noticed-by: Tetsuo
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 10:35:51AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 27-11-17 09:44:53, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> [...]
> > > From 1009db61988c48c9a9e327a9d076945b29b02eee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > From: Michal Hocko
> > > Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 17:13:40 +0100
> > >
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 10:35:51AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 27-11-17 09:44:53, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> [...]
> > > From 1009db61988c48c9a9e327a9d076945b29b02eee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > From: Michal Hocko
> > > Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 17:13:40 +0100
> > > Subject: [PATCH] xfs:
On Mon 27-11-17 09:44:53, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
[...]
> > From 1009db61988c48c9a9e327a9d076945b29b02eee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Michal Hocko
> > Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 17:13:40 +0100
> > Subject: [PATCH] xfs: fortify xfs_alloc_buftarg error handling
> >
> >
On Mon 27-11-17 09:44:53, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
[...]
> > From 1009db61988c48c9a9e327a9d076945b29b02eee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Michal Hocko
> > Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 17:13:40 +0100
> > Subject: [PATCH] xfs: fortify xfs_alloc_buftarg error handling
> >
> > percpu_counter_init
On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 08:39:57AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 24-11-17 09:00:46, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 05:11:37PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Fri 24-11-17 01:01:10, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> > > > Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > > On Thu 23-11-17 05:26:33,
On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 08:39:57AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 24-11-17 09:00:46, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 05:11:37PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Fri 24-11-17 01:01:10, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> > > > Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > > On Thu 23-11-17 05:26:33,
On Sun 26-11-17 11:14:25, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> Dave Chinner wrote:
> > IOWs, we don't actually need to touch this code, but if you really
> > must, just remove the KM_NOFS tag.
>
> OK. Then, please remove KM_NOFS. GFP_KERNEL is safer than GFP_NOFS
> in the sense that it won't cause OOM lockup
On Sun 26-11-17 11:14:25, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> Dave Chinner wrote:
> > IOWs, we don't actually need to touch this code, but if you really
> > must, just remove the KM_NOFS tag.
>
> OK. Then, please remove KM_NOFS. GFP_KERNEL is safer than GFP_NOFS
> in the sense that it won't cause OOM lockup
Dave Chinner wrote:
> IOWs, we don't actually need to touch this code, but if you really
> must, just remove the KM_NOFS tag.
OK. Then, please remove KM_NOFS. GFP_KERNEL is safer than GFP_NOFS
in the sense that it won't cause OOM lockup due to unable to invoke
the OOM killer.
Dave Chinner wrote:
> IOWs, we don't actually need to touch this code, but if you really
> must, just remove the KM_NOFS tag.
OK. Then, please remove KM_NOFS. GFP_KERNEL is safer than GFP_NOFS
in the sense that it won't cause OOM lockup due to unable to invoke
the OOM killer.
On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 09:03:28PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> Michal Hocko wrote:
> > Thanks. Updated patch below
> > ---
> > From 1009db61988c48c9a9e327a9d076945b29b02eee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Michal Hocko
> > Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 17:13:40 +0100
> > Subject:
On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 09:03:28PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> Michal Hocko wrote:
> > Thanks. Updated patch below
> > ---
> > From 1009db61988c48c9a9e327a9d076945b29b02eee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Michal Hocko
> > Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 17:13:40 +0100
> > Subject: [PATCH] xfs: fortify
On Fri 24-11-17 21:03:28, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> Michal Hocko wrote:
> > Thanks. Updated patch below
> > ---
> > From 1009db61988c48c9a9e327a9d076945b29b02eee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Michal Hocko
> > Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 17:13:40 +0100
> > Subject: [PATCH] xfs:
On Fri 24-11-17 21:03:28, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> Michal Hocko wrote:
> > Thanks. Updated patch below
> > ---
> > From 1009db61988c48c9a9e327a9d076945b29b02eee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Michal Hocko
> > Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 17:13:40 +0100
> > Subject: [PATCH] xfs: fortify
Michal Hocko wrote:
> Thanks. Updated patch below
> ---
> From 1009db61988c48c9a9e327a9d076945b29b02eee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Michal Hocko
> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 17:13:40 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] xfs: fortify xfs_alloc_buftarg error handling
Do we need below patch
Michal Hocko wrote:
> Thanks. Updated patch below
> ---
> From 1009db61988c48c9a9e327a9d076945b29b02eee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Michal Hocko
> Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 17:13:40 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] xfs: fortify xfs_alloc_buftarg error handling
Do we need below patch on top of Michal's
On Fri 24-11-17 09:00:46, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 05:11:37PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Fri 24-11-17 01:01:10, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> > > Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > On Thu 23-11-17 05:26:33, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > > > Looks good,
> > > > >
> > > > >
On Fri 24-11-17 09:00:46, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 05:11:37PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Fri 24-11-17 01:01:10, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> > > Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > On Thu 23-11-17 05:26:33, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > > > Looks good,
> > > > >
> > > > >
20 matches
Mail list logo