Hello Andrew,
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 04:07:00PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Sep 2015 14:03:51 +0900 Minchan Kim wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 07:42:56PM +0100, Luis Henriques wrote:
> > > When the user supplies an unsupported compression algorithm, keep the
> > > previously
On Thu, 10 Sep 2015 14:03:51 +0900 Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 07:42:56PM +0100, Luis Henriques wrote:
> > When the user supplies an unsupported compression algorithm, keep the
> > previously selected one (knowingly supported) or the default one (if the
> > compression algorithm
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 02:33:19PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On (09/10/15 14:03), Minchan Kim wrote:
> [..]
> >
> > I guess most of scripts have checked result of his doing so if we
> > removes it, it will break them.
>
> to be honest, we never documented or required any of th
Hello,
On (09/10/15 14:03), Minchan Kim wrote:
[..]
>
> I guess most of scripts have checked result of his doing so if we
> removes it, it will break them.
to be honest, we never documented or required any of those. the only source
of information for the user space -- zram.txt documentation -- si
On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 07:42:56PM +0100, Luis Henriques wrote:
> When the user supplies an unsupported compression algorithm, keep the
> previously selected one (knowingly supported) or the default one (if the
> compression algorithm hasn't been changed yet).
>
> Note that previously this operati
On (09/08/15 19:42), Luis Henriques wrote:
>
> Note that previously this operation (i.e. setting an invalid algorithm)
> would result in no algorithm being selected, which means that this
> represents a small change in the default behaviour.
>
previously it would result in guaranteed to fail
When the user supplies an unsupported compression algorithm, keep the
previously selected one (knowingly supported) or the default one (if the
compression algorithm hasn't been changed yet).
Note that previously this operation (i.e. setting an invalid algorithm)
would result in no algorithm being
7 matches
Mail list logo