On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 02:46:06PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 30-11-16 13:15:16, Yu Zhao wrote:
> > __unregister_cpu_notifier() only removes registered notifier from its
> > linked list when CPU hotplug is configured. If we free registered CPU
> > notifier when HOTPLUG_CPU=n, we corrupt
On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 02:46:06PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 30-11-16 13:15:16, Yu Zhao wrote:
> > __unregister_cpu_notifier() only removes registered notifier from its
> > linked list when CPU hotplug is configured. If we free registered CPU
> > notifier when HOTPLUG_CPU=n, we corrupt
On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 9:44 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 02-12-16 15:38:48, Michal Hocko wrote:
>> On Fri 02-12-16 09:24:35, Dan Streetman wrote:
>> > On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 8:46 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
>> > > On Wed 30-11-16 13:15:16, Yu Zhao wrote:
>>
On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 9:44 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 02-12-16 15:38:48, Michal Hocko wrote:
>> On Fri 02-12-16 09:24:35, Dan Streetman wrote:
>> > On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 8:46 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
>> > > On Wed 30-11-16 13:15:16, Yu Zhao wrote:
>> > >> __unregister_cpu_notifier() only
On Fri 02-12-16 15:38:48, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 02-12-16 09:24:35, Dan Streetman wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 8:46 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Wed 30-11-16 13:15:16, Yu Zhao wrote:
> > >> __unregister_cpu_notifier() only removes registered notifier from its
> >
On Fri 02-12-16 15:38:48, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 02-12-16 09:24:35, Dan Streetman wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 8:46 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Wed 30-11-16 13:15:16, Yu Zhao wrote:
> > >> __unregister_cpu_notifier() only removes registered notifier from its
> > >> linked list
On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 8:46 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 30-11-16 13:15:16, Yu Zhao wrote:
>> __unregister_cpu_notifier() only removes registered notifier from its
>> linked list when CPU hotplug is configured. If we free registered CPU
>> notifier when HOTPLUG_CPU=n, we
On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 8:46 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 30-11-16 13:15:16, Yu Zhao wrote:
>> __unregister_cpu_notifier() only removes registered notifier from its
>> linked list when CPU hotplug is configured. If we free registered CPU
>> notifier when HOTPLUG_CPU=n, we corrupt the linked
On Fri 02-12-16 09:24:35, Dan Streetman wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 8:46 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Wed 30-11-16 13:15:16, Yu Zhao wrote:
> >> __unregister_cpu_notifier() only removes registered notifier from its
> >> linked list when CPU hotplug is configured. If we
On Fri 02-12-16 09:24:35, Dan Streetman wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 8:46 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Wed 30-11-16 13:15:16, Yu Zhao wrote:
> >> __unregister_cpu_notifier() only removes registered notifier from its
> >> linked list when CPU hotplug is configured. If we free registered CPU
>
On Wed 30-11-16 13:15:16, Yu Zhao wrote:
> __unregister_cpu_notifier() only removes registered notifier from its
> linked list when CPU hotplug is configured. If we free registered CPU
> notifier when HOTPLUG_CPU=n, we corrupt the linked list.
>
> To fix the problem, we can either use a static
On Wed 30-11-16 13:15:16, Yu Zhao wrote:
> __unregister_cpu_notifier() only removes registered notifier from its
> linked list when CPU hotplug is configured. If we free registered CPU
> notifier when HOTPLUG_CPU=n, we corrupt the linked list.
>
> To fix the problem, we can either use a static
__unregister_cpu_notifier() only removes registered notifier from its
linked list when CPU hotplug is configured. If we free registered CPU
notifier when HOTPLUG_CPU=n, we corrupt the linked list.
To fix the problem, we can either use a static CPU notifier that walks
through each pool or just
__unregister_cpu_notifier() only removes registered notifier from its
linked list when CPU hotplug is configured. If we free registered CPU
notifier when HOTPLUG_CPU=n, we corrupt the linked list.
To fix the problem, we can either use a static CPU notifier that walks
through each pool or just
14 matches
Mail list logo