On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 07:30:38PM +0200, Xypron wrote:
> Hello Josh,
>
> being able to patch a live kernel is very interesting feature. I looked
> through you patch and some questions remained:
>
> In Documentation/kpatch.txt I found no description on how an out of kernel
> program uses the new
Hello Josh,
being able to patch a live kernel is very interesting feature. I looked
through you patch and some questions remained:
In Documentation/kpatch.txt I found no description on how an out of
kernel program uses the new code.
See https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/7/14/862
Please, create
Hello Josh,
being able to patch a live kernel is very interesting feature. I looked
through you patch and some questions remained:
In Documentation/kpatch.txt I found no description on how an out of
kernel program uses the new code.
See https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/7/14/862
Please, create
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 07:30:38PM +0200, Xypron wrote:
Hello Josh,
being able to patch a live kernel is very interesting feature. I looked
through you patch and some questions remained:
In Documentation/kpatch.txt I found no description on how an out of kernel
program uses the new code.
This is a v2 posting of the kpatch core module, based on 3.16-rc5.
There have been many improvements since v1
(https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/5/1/273):
- Dynamic relocation support
- Per-object patching
- Module patching and deferred module patching
- User load/unload hook functions
- Force unsafe
This is a v2 posting of the kpatch core module, based on 3.16-rc5.
There have been many improvements since v1
(https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/5/1/273):
- Dynamic relocation support
- Per-object patching
- Module patching and deferred module patching
- User load/unload hook functions
- Force unsafe
6 matches
Mail list logo
