On Tue, 18 Oct 2016, Vaishali Thakkar wrote:
>
>
> On Tuesday 18 October 2016 10:31 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 18 Oct 2016, Vaishali Thakkar wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tuesday 18 October 2016 10:04 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
> >>> I get the following in patch mode that I don't ge
On Tuesday 18 October 2016 10:31 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 18 Oct 2016, Vaishali Thakkar wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday 18 October 2016 10:04 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
>>> I get the following in patch mode that I don't get in context mode:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Are you getting same number of
On Tue, 18 Oct 2016, Vaishali Thakkar wrote:
>
>
> On Tuesday 18 October 2016 10:04 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > I get the following in patch mode that I don't get in context mode:
>
> Hi,
>
> Are you getting same number of devm cases in your report for the context
> and patch mode? [except this
On Tuesday 18 October 2016 10:04 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
> I get the following in patch mode that I don't get in context mode:
Hi,
Are you getting same number of devm cases in your report for the context
and patch mode? [except this case]
> diff -u -p a/drivers/power/supply/tps65090-charger.c
I get the following in patch mode that I don't get in context mode:
diff -u -p a/drivers/power/supply/tps65090-charger.c
b/drivers/power/supply/tps\
65090-charger.c
--- a/drivers/power/supply/tps65090-charger.c
+++ b/drivers/power/supply/tps65090-charger.c
@@ -311,7 +311,8 @@ static int tps65090_c
Few changes to improve the results given by the irqf_oneshot.cocci:
- Change in the matching rules to eliminate false postives in the
patch mode
- Change in the context mode to eliminate false postives in the
context mode
- Support for the missing devm_request_threaded_irq in context, report
6 matches
Mail list logo