Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Correct for ACPI 5.1->6.0 spec changes in MADT GICC entries

2015-07-02 Thread Al Stone
On 06/30/2015 08:06 PM, Hanjun Guo wrote: > On 2015/7/1 2:35, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 8:25 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>> Hi Al, >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 7:29 PM, Al Stone wrote: On 06/30/2015 11:07 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote: > Hi Al, > > On 18/0

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Correct for ACPI 5.1->6.0 spec changes in MADT GICC entries

2015-06-30 Thread Hanjun Guo
On 2015/7/1 2:35, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 8:25 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> Hi Al, >> >> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 7:29 PM, Al Stone wrote: >>> On 06/30/2015 11:07 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote: Hi Al, On 18/06/15 23:36, Al Stone wrote: > In the ACPI 5.1 ve

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Correct for ACPI 5.1->6.0 spec changes in MADT GICC entries

2015-06-30 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
Hi Al, On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 9:45 PM, Al Stone wrote: > On 06/30/2015 12:25 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> Hi Al, >> >> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 7:29 PM, Al Stone wrote: >>> On 06/30/2015 11:07 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote: Hi Al, On 18/06/15 23:36, Al Stone wrote: > In the ACPI 5

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Correct for ACPI 5.1->6.0 spec changes in MADT GICC entries

2015-06-30 Thread Al Stone
On 06/30/2015 01:05 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Hi Al, > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 8:39 PM, Al Stone wrote: >> On 06/30/2015 12:25 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>> Hi Al, >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 7:29 PM, Al Stone wrote: On 06/30/2015 11:07 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote: > Hi Al, >>>

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Correct for ACPI 5.1->6.0 spec changes in MADT GICC entries

2015-06-30 Thread Al Stone
On 06/30/2015 12:25 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Hi Al, > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 7:29 PM, Al Stone wrote: >> On 06/30/2015 11:07 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote: >>> Hi Al, >>> >>> On 18/06/15 23:36, Al Stone wrote: In the ACPI 5.1 version of the spec, the struct for the GICC subtable (stru

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Correct for ACPI 5.1->6.0 spec changes in MADT GICC entries

2015-06-30 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
Hi Al, On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 8:39 PM, Al Stone wrote: > On 06/30/2015 12:25 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> Hi Al, >> >> On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 7:29 PM, Al Stone wrote: >>> On 06/30/2015 11:07 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote: Hi Al, On 18/06/15 23:36, Al Stone wrote: > In the ACPI 5

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Correct for ACPI 5.1->6.0 spec changes in MADT GICC entries

2015-06-30 Thread Al Stone
On 06/30/2015 12:25 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Hi Al, > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 7:29 PM, Al Stone wrote: >> On 06/30/2015 11:07 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote: >>> Hi Al, >>> >>> On 18/06/15 23:36, Al Stone wrote: In the ACPI 5.1 version of the spec, the struct for the GICC subtable (stru

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Correct for ACPI 5.1->6.0 spec changes in MADT GICC entries

2015-06-30 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 8:25 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Hi Al, > > On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 7:29 PM, Al Stone wrote: >> On 06/30/2015 11:07 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote: >>> Hi Al, >>> >>> On 18/06/15 23:36, Al Stone wrote: In the ACPI 5.1 version of the spec, the struct for the GICC subtable >

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Correct for ACPI 5.1->6.0 spec changes in MADT GICC entries

2015-06-30 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
Hi Al, On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 7:29 PM, Al Stone wrote: > On 06/30/2015 11:07 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote: >> Hi Al, >> >> On 18/06/15 23:36, Al Stone wrote: >>> In the ACPI 5.1 version of the spec, the struct for the GICC subtable >>> (struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt) of the MADT is 76 bytes long;

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Correct for ACPI 5.1->6.0 spec changes in MADT GICC entries

2015-06-30 Thread Al Stone
On 06/30/2015 11:07 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote: > Hi Al, > > On 18/06/15 23:36, Al Stone wrote: >> In the ACPI 5.1 version of the spec, the struct for the GICC subtable >> (struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt) of the MADT is 76 bytes long; in >> ACPI 6.0, the struct is 80 bytes long. But, there is onl

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Correct for ACPI 5.1->6.0 spec changes in MADT GICC entries

2015-06-30 Thread Sudeep Holla
Hi Al, On 18/06/15 23:36, Al Stone wrote: In the ACPI 5.1 version of the spec, the struct for the GICC subtable (struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt) of the MADT is 76 bytes long; in ACPI 6.0, the struct is 80 bytes long. But, there is only one definition in ACPICA for this struct -- and that is

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Correct for ACPI 5.1->6.0 spec changes in MADT GICC entries

2015-06-19 Thread Al Stone
On 06/19/2015 04:54 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote: > On 06/19/2015 06:36 AM, Al Stone wrote: >> In the ACPI 5.1 version of the spec, the struct for the GICC subtable >> (struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt) of the MADT is 76 bytes long; in >> ACPI 6.0, the struct is 80 bytes long. But, there is only one def

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Correct for ACPI 5.1->6.0 spec changes in MADT GICC entries

2015-06-19 Thread Hanjun Guo
On 06/19/2015 06:36 AM, Al Stone wrote: In the ACPI 5.1 version of the spec, the struct for the GICC subtable (struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt) of the MADT is 76 bytes long; in ACPI 6.0, the struct is 80 bytes long. But, there is only one definition in ACPICA for this struct -- and that is th

[PATCH v2 0/3] Correct for ACPI 5.1->6.0 spec changes in MADT GICC entries

2015-06-18 Thread Al Stone
In the ACPI 5.1 version of the spec, the struct for the GICC subtable (struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt) of the MADT is 76 bytes long; in ACPI 6.0, the struct is 80 bytes long. But, there is only one definition in ACPICA for this struct -- and that is the 6.0 version. Hence, when BAD_MADT_ENTRY