Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] DCMI bridge support

2019-07-05 Thread Sakari Ailus
Hi Laurent, On Fri, Jul 05, 2019 at 11:04:24AM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote: ... > > A reasonable compromise would be to add a Kconfig option that allows > > enabling MC. This way you can provide backwards compatibility and allow > > making use of the full potential of the hardware. That's

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] DCMI bridge support

2019-07-05 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Sakari, On Fri, Jul 05, 2019 at 10:55:22AM +0300, Sakari Ailus wrote: > On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 04:38:24PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 12:38:40PM +, Hugues FRUCHET wrote: > >> On 6/26/19 7:25 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > >>> On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] DCMI bridge support

2019-07-05 Thread Sakari Ailus
Hi Laurent, On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 04:38:24PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Hugues, > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 12:38:40PM +, Hugues FRUCHET wrote: > > On 6/26/19 7:25 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 10:10:05AM +, Hugues FRUCHET wrote: > > >> Hi Sakari, >

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] DCMI bridge support

2019-06-27 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Hugues, On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 12:38:40PM +, Hugues FRUCHET wrote: > On 6/26/19 7:25 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 10:10:05AM +, Hugues FRUCHET wrote: > >> Hi Sakari, > >> > >>> - Where's the sub-device representing the bridge itself? > >> > >> This is

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] DCMI bridge support

2019-06-27 Thread Hugues FRUCHET
Hi Laurent, Thanks for reviewing, On 6/26/19 7:25 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Hugues, > > On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 10:10:05AM +, Hugues FRUCHET wrote: >> Hi Sakari, >> >> > - Where's the sub-device representing the bridge itself? >> This is pointed by [1]:

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] DCMI bridge support

2019-06-26 Thread Laurent Pinchart
Hi Hugues, On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 10:10:05AM +, Hugues FRUCHET wrote: > Hi Sakari, > > > - Where's the sub-device representing the bridge itself? > This is pointed by [1]: drivers/media/i2c/st-mipid02.c > > > - As the driver becomes MC-centric, crop configuration takes place > through >

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] DCMI bridge support

2019-06-24 Thread Hugues FRUCHET
Hi Sakari, > - Where's the sub-device representing the bridge itself? This is pointed by [1]: drivers/media/i2c/st-mipid02.c > - As the driver becomes MC-centric, crop configuration takes place through > V4L2 sub-device interface, not through the video device node. > - Same goes for

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] DCMI bridge support

2019-06-20 Thread Sakari Ailus
Hi Hugues, On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 10:48:29AM +0200, Hugues Fruchet wrote: > This patch serie allows to connect non-parallel camera sensor to > DCMI thanks to a bridge connected in between such as STMIPID02 [1]. > > Media controller support is introduced first, then support of > several

[PATCH v2 0/3] DCMI bridge support

2019-06-11 Thread Hugues Fruchet
This patch serie allows to connect non-parallel camera sensor to DCMI thanks to a bridge connected in between such as STMIPID02 [1]. Media controller support is introduced first, then support of several sub-devices within pipeline with dynamic linking between them. In order to keep backward