Dear Arnd and Daniel,
On Wed, 4 Nov 2015 13:19:53 +0100
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 November 2015 12:19:57 Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > On 11/04/2015 11:30 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 04 November 2015 10:46:49 Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > >> On 11/03/2015 03:28 PM,
On Wednesday 04 November 2015 12:19:57 Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 11/04/2015 11:30 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Wednesday 04 November 2015 10:46:49 Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> >> On 11/03/2015 03:28 PM, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> >>> In case there are several possible delay timers, we purely base the
>
On 11/04/2015 11:30 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Wednesday 04 November 2015 10:46:49 Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 11/03/2015 03:28 PM, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
In case there are several possible delay timers, we purely base the
selection on the frequency, which is suboptimal in some cases. Take
one
On Wednesday 04 November 2015 10:46:49 Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 11/03/2015 03:28 PM, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > In case there are several possible delay timers, we purely base the
> > selection on the frequency, which is suboptimal in some cases. Take
> > one Marvell Berlin platform for example:
On 11/03/2015 03:28 PM, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
In case there are several possible delay timers, we purely base the
selection on the frequency, which is suboptimal in some cases. Take
one Marvell Berlin platform for example: we have arch timer and dw-apb
timer. The arch timer freq is 25MHZ while
Dear Arnd and Daniel,
On Wed, 4 Nov 2015 13:19:53 +0100
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 November 2015 12:19:57 Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > On 11/04/2015 11:30 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 04 November 2015 10:46:49 Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > >> On 11/03/2015 03:28 PM,
On Wednesday 04 November 2015 12:19:57 Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 11/04/2015 11:30 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Wednesday 04 November 2015 10:46:49 Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> >> On 11/03/2015 03:28 PM, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> >>> In case there are several possible delay timers, we purely base the
>
On 11/03/2015 03:28 PM, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
In case there are several possible delay timers, we purely base the
selection on the frequency, which is suboptimal in some cases. Take
one Marvell Berlin platform for example: we have arch timer and dw-apb
timer. The arch timer freq is 25MHZ while
On Wednesday 04 November 2015 10:46:49 Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 11/03/2015 03:28 PM, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> > In case there are several possible delay timers, we purely base the
> > selection on the frequency, which is suboptimal in some cases. Take
> > one Marvell Berlin platform for example:
On 11/04/2015 11:30 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Wednesday 04 November 2015 10:46:49 Daniel Lezcano wrote:
On 11/03/2015 03:28 PM, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
In case there are several possible delay timers, we purely base the
selection on the frequency, which is suboptimal in some cases. Take
one
In case there are several possible delay timers, we purely base the
selection on the frequency, which is suboptimal in some cases. Take
one Marvell Berlin platform for example: we have arch timer and dw-apb
timer. The arch timer freq is 25MHZ while the dw-apb timer freq is
100MHZ, current
In case there are several possible delay timers, we purely base the
selection on the frequency, which is suboptimal in some cases. Take
one Marvell Berlin platform for example: we have arch timer and dw-apb
timer. The arch timer freq is 25MHZ while the dw-apb timer freq is
100MHZ, current
12 matches
Mail list logo