Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] x86/dumpstack: Print registers with the same log level as the backtrace

2020-07-20 Thread Dmitry Safonov
Hi Ingo, Thomas, Could you take these to x86/tip tree? (in case they are good enough) On 6/29/20 3:48 PM, Dmitry Safonov wrote: > Changes since v1 [3]: > - Use (enum show_regs_mode) instead of (int) [nit by Jann, thanks!] > - Add acks from Petr > > show_trace_log_lvl() provides x86

[PATCH v2 0/3] x86/dumpstack: Print registers with the same log level as the backtrace

2020-06-29 Thread Dmitry Safonov
Changes since v1 [3]: - Use (enum show_regs_mode) instead of (int) [nit by Jann, thanks!] - Add acks from Petr show_trace_log_lvl() provides x86 platform-specific way to unwind backtrace with a given log level. Unfortunately, registers dump(s) are not printed with the same log level - instead,