> Hi Michael
>
> On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 07:47:23PM +0100, Micha?? K??pie?? wrote:
> > > > In light of the above findings, what would you like to do?
> > >
> > > Thanks for testing, good that we caught this before the patch series was
> > > applied. I think it is reasonable to skip applying this
Hi Michael
On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 07:47:23PM +0100, Micha?? K??pie?? wrote:
> > > In light of the above findings, what would you like to do?
> >
> > Thanks for testing, good that we caught this before the patch series was
> > applied. I think it is reasonable to skip applying this version of th
> > Hi Michael
> >
> > Some quick feedback.
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 03:31:04PM +1030, Jonathan Woithe wrote:
> > > > > I can add that immediately after loading the driver the value
> > > > > returned by a
> > > > > read of bl_power is 0. As noted above, setting to 1 makes no
> > > > >
> Hi Michael
>
> Some quick feedback.
>
> On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 03:31:04PM +1030, Jonathan Woithe wrote:
> > > > I can add that immediately after loading the driver the value returned
> > > > by a
> > > > read of bl_power is 0. As noted above, setting to 1 makes no
> > > > difference to
> >
Hi Michael
Some quick feedback.
On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 03:31:04PM +1030, Jonathan Woithe wrote:
> > > I can add that immediately after loading the driver the value returned by
> > > a
> > > read of bl_power is 0. As noted above, setting to 1 makes no difference
> > > to
> > > the backlight, n
Hi Michael
On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 05:49:05AM +0100, Micha?? K??pie?? wrote:
> > > With regard to patch 2/4 you wrote:
> > > > Jonathan, this *really* needs testing on relevant hardware. After
> > > > applying this patch, you should be able to turn LCD backlight on and off
> > > > using /sys/clas
Hi Jonathan,
Thanks for testing this series.
> Hi Michael
>
> On Sat, Mar 04, 2017 at 12:17:23PM +1030, Jonathan Woithe wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 09:10:40AM +0100, Micha?? K??pie?? wrote:
> > > These patches should make fujitsu_init() a bit more palatable. No
> > > changes are made to
Hi Michael
On Sat, Mar 04, 2017 at 12:17:23PM +1030, Jonathan Woithe wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 09:10:40AM +0100, Micha?? K??pie?? wrote:
> > These patches should make fujitsu_init() a bit more palatable. No
> > changes are made to platform device code yet, for clarity these will be
> > pos
Hi Michael
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 09:10:40AM +0100, Micha?? K??pie?? wrote:
> These patches should make fujitsu_init() a bit more palatable. No
> changes are made to platform device code yet, for clarity these will be
> posted in a separate series after this one gets applied.
I have a prelimina
On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 08:19:38AM +0100, Micha?? K??pie?? wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 09:10:40AM +0100, Micha?? K??pie?? wrote:
> > > These patches should make fujitsu_init() a bit more palatable. No
> > > changes are made to platform device code yet, for clarity these will be
> > > posted
> On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 09:10:40AM +0100, Micha?? K??pie?? wrote:
> > These patches should make fujitsu_init() a bit more palatable. No
> > changes are made to platform device code yet, for clarity these will be
> > posted in a separate series after this one gets applied.
>
> Thanks for these.
On Wed, Mar 01, 2017 at 09:10:40AM +0100, Micha?? K??pie?? wrote:
> These patches should make fujitsu_init() a bit more palatable. No
> changes are made to platform device code yet, for clarity these will be
> posted in a separate series after this one gets applied.
Thanks for these. As for the
These patches should make fujitsu_init() a bit more palatable. No
changes are made to platform device code yet, for clarity these will be
posted in a separate series after this one gets applied.
Changes from v1:
- Rebase on top of reworked Alan Jenkins' cleanup patch series.
- Drop patch 1/
13 matches
Mail list logo
