On Thu, 2012-11-29 at 10:25 +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
> On 2012-11-29 9:42, Jaegeuk Hanse wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 04:47:42PM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>Seems it's a great chance to discuss about the memory hotplug feature
> >> within this thread. So I will try to give
On 11/30/2012 11:15 AM, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
> Hi Jiang,
>
>>
>> For the first issue, I think we could automatically convert pages
>> from movable zones into normal zones. Congyan from Fujitsu has provided
>> a patchset to manually convert pages from movable zones into normal zones,
>> I
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 02:58:40AM +, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > If any significant percentage of memory is in ZONE_MOVABLE then the memory
> > hotplug people will have to deal with all the lowmem/highmem problems
> > that used to be faced by 32-bit x86 with PAE enabled.
>
> While these problems
On 11/30/2012 06:58 AM, Luck, Tony wrote:
>> If any significant percentage of memory is in ZONE_MOVABLE then the memory
>> hotplug people will have to deal with all the lowmem/highmem problems
>> that used to be faced by 32-bit x86 with PAE enabled.
>
> While these problems may still exist on
On 11/28/2012 12:08 PM, Jiang Liu wrote:
> On 2012-11-28 11:24, Bob Liu wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Tang Chen wrote:
>>> On 11/27/2012 08:09 PM, Bob Liu wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Tang Chen
wrote:
>
> Hi Liu,
>
>
> This feature is
On 11/28/2012 12:08 PM, Jiang Liu wrote:
On 2012-11-28 11:24, Bob Liu wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Tang Chen tangc...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
On 11/27/2012 08:09 PM, Bob Liu wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Tang Chentangc...@cn.fujitsu.com
wrote:
Hi Liu,
This feature is
On 11/30/2012 06:58 AM, Luck, Tony wrote:
If any significant percentage of memory is in ZONE_MOVABLE then the memory
hotplug people will have to deal with all the lowmem/highmem problems
that used to be faced by 32-bit x86 with PAE enabled.
While these problems may still exist on large
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 02:58:40AM +, Luck, Tony wrote:
If any significant percentage of memory is in ZONE_MOVABLE then the memory
hotplug people will have to deal with all the lowmem/highmem problems
that used to be faced by 32-bit x86 with PAE enabled.
While these problems may
On 11/30/2012 11:15 AM, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
Hi Jiang,
For the first issue, I think we could automatically convert pages
from movable zones into normal zones. Congyan from Fujitsu has provided
a patchset to manually convert pages from movable zones into normal zones,
I think we could
On Thu, 2012-11-29 at 10:25 +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
On 2012-11-29 9:42, Jaegeuk Hanse wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 04:47:42PM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
Hi all,
Seems it's a great chance to discuss about the memory hotplug feature
within this thread. So I will try to give some high
Disk I/O is still a big consumer of lowmem.
"Luck, Tony" wrote:
>> If any significant percentage of memory is in ZONE_MOVABLE then the
>memory
>> hotplug people will have to deal with all the lowmem/highmem problems
>> that used to be faced by 32-bit x86 with PAE enabled.
>
>While these
Hi Jiang,
2012/11/30 11:56, Jiang Liu wrote:
Hi Mel,
Thanks for your great comments!
On 2012-11-29 19:00, Mel Gorman wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 01:38:47PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
On 11/28/2012 01:34 PM, Luck, Tony wrote:
2. use boot option
This is our proposal. New boot
Hi Mel,
Thanks for your great comments!
On 2012-11-29 19:00, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 01:38:47PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> On 11/28/2012 01:34 PM, Luck, Tony wrote:
2. use boot option
This is our proposal. New boot option can specify memory range
> If any significant percentage of memory is in ZONE_MOVABLE then the memory
> hotplug people will have to deal with all the lowmem/highmem problems
> that used to be faced by 32-bit x86 with PAE enabled.
While these problems may still exist on large systems - I think it becomes
harder to
On 11/29/2012 02:41 PM, Luck, Tony wrote:
>> The other bit is that if you really really want high reliability, memory
>> mirroring is the way to go; it is the only way you will be able to
>> hotremove memory without having to have a pre-event to migrate the
>> memory away from the affected node
> The other bit is that if you really really want high reliability, memory
> mirroring is the way to go; it is the only way you will be able to
> hotremove memory without having to have a pre-event to migrate the
> memory away from the affected node before the memory is offlined.
Some platforms
On 11/29/2012 03:00 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
>
> I've not been paying a whole pile of attention to this because it's not an
> area I'm active in but I agree that configuring ZONE_MOVABLE like
> this at boot-time is going to be problematic. As awkward as it is, it
> would probably work out better to
Hi Yasuaki,
Forgot to mention that I have no objection to this patchset.
I think it's a good start point, but we still need to improve usabilities
of memory hotplug by passing platform specific information from BIOS.
And mechanism provided by this patchset will/may be used to improve
On 11/29/2012 06:38 PM, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
> Hi Tony,
>
> 2012/11/29 6:34, Luck, Tony wrote:
>>> 1. use firmware information
>>>According to ACPI spec 5.0, SRAT table has memory affinity structure
>>>and the structure has Hot Pluggable Filed. See "5.2.16.2 Memory
>>>Affinity
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 07:38:26PM +0900, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
> Hi Tony,
>
> 2012/11/29 6:34, Luck, Tony wrote:
> >>1. use firmware information
> >> According to ACPI spec 5.0, SRAT table has memory affinity structure
> >> and the structure has Hot Pluggable Filed. See "5.2.16.2 Memory
>
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 01:38:47PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 11/28/2012 01:34 PM, Luck, Tony wrote:
> >>
> >> 2. use boot option
> >> This is our proposal. New boot option can specify memory range to use
> >> as movable memory.
> >
> > Isn't this just moving the work to the user? To
Hi Tony,
2012/11/29 6:34, Luck, Tony wrote:
1. use firmware information
According to ACPI spec 5.0, SRAT table has memory affinity structure
and the structure has Hot Pluggable Filed. See "5.2.16.2 Memory
Affinity Structure". If we use the information, we might be able to
specify
Hi Tony,
2012/11/29 6:34, Luck, Tony wrote:
1. use firmware information
According to ACPI spec 5.0, SRAT table has memory affinity structure
and the structure has Hot Pluggable Filed. See 5.2.16.2 Memory
Affinity Structure. If we use the information, we might be able to
specify
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 01:38:47PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
On 11/28/2012 01:34 PM, Luck, Tony wrote:
2. use boot option
This is our proposal. New boot option can specify memory range to use
as movable memory.
Isn't this just moving the work to the user? To pick good values
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 07:38:26PM +0900, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
Hi Tony,
2012/11/29 6:34, Luck, Tony wrote:
1. use firmware information
According to ACPI spec 5.0, SRAT table has memory affinity structure
and the structure has Hot Pluggable Filed. See 5.2.16.2 Memory
Affinity
On 11/29/2012 06:38 PM, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
Hi Tony,
2012/11/29 6:34, Luck, Tony wrote:
1. use firmware information
According to ACPI spec 5.0, SRAT table has memory affinity structure
and the structure has Hot Pluggable Filed. See 5.2.16.2 Memory
Affinity Structure. If we
Hi Yasuaki,
Forgot to mention that I have no objection to this patchset.
I think it's a good start point, but we still need to improve usabilities
of memory hotplug by passing platform specific information from BIOS.
And mechanism provided by this patchset will/may be used to improve
On 11/29/2012 03:00 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
I've not been paying a whole pile of attention to this because it's not an
area I'm active in but I agree that configuring ZONE_MOVABLE like
this at boot-time is going to be problematic. As awkward as it is, it
would probably work out better to only
The other bit is that if you really really want high reliability, memory
mirroring is the way to go; it is the only way you will be able to
hotremove memory without having to have a pre-event to migrate the
memory away from the affected node before the memory is offlined.
Some platforms don't
On 11/29/2012 02:41 PM, Luck, Tony wrote:
The other bit is that if you really really want high reliability, memory
mirroring is the way to go; it is the only way you will be able to
hotremove memory without having to have a pre-event to migrate the
memory away from the affected node before the
If any significant percentage of memory is in ZONE_MOVABLE then the memory
hotplug people will have to deal with all the lowmem/highmem problems
that used to be faced by 32-bit x86 with PAE enabled.
While these problems may still exist on large systems - I think it becomes
harder to construct
Hi Mel,
Thanks for your great comments!
On 2012-11-29 19:00, Mel Gorman wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 01:38:47PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
On 11/28/2012 01:34 PM, Luck, Tony wrote:
2. use boot option
This is our proposal. New boot option can specify memory range to use
as
Hi Jiang,
2012/11/30 11:56, Jiang Liu wrote:
Hi Mel,
Thanks for your great comments!
On 2012-11-29 19:00, Mel Gorman wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 01:38:47PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
On 11/28/2012 01:34 PM, Luck, Tony wrote:
2. use boot option
This is our proposal. New boot
Disk I/O is still a big consumer of lowmem.
Luck, Tony tony.l...@intel.com wrote:
If any significant percentage of memory is in ZONE_MOVABLE then the
memory
hotplug people will have to deal with all the lowmem/highmem problems
that used to be faced by 32-bit x86 with PAE enabled.
While
On 2012-11-29 10:49, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 10:25:40AM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
>> On 2012-11-29 9:42, Jaegeuk Hanse wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 04:47:42PM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
Hi all,
Seems it's a great chance to discuss about the memory hotplug feature
On 2012-11-29 9:42, Jaegeuk Hanse wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 04:47:42PM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> Seems it's a great chance to discuss about the memory hotplug feature
>> within this thread. So I will try to give some high level thoughts about
>> memory
>> hotplug feature
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 04:47:42PM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
>Hi all,
> Seems it's a great chance to discuss about the memory hotplug feature
>within this thread. So I will try to give some high level thoughts about memory
>hotplug feature on x86/IA64. Any comments are welcomed!
> First
On 11/29/2012 08:43 AM, Jaegeuk Hanse wrote:
Hi Tang,
I haven't read the patchset yet, but could you give a short describe how
you design your implementation in this patchset?
Regards,
Jaegeuk
Hi Jaegeuk,
Thanks for your joining in. :)
This feature is used in memory hotplug.
In order to
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 04:29:01PM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
>At 11/28/2012 12:08 PM, Jiang Liu Wrote:
>> On 2012-11-28 11:24, Bob Liu wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Tang Chen wrote:
On 11/27/2012 08:09 PM, Bob Liu wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Tang Chen
On 11/28/2012 01:34 PM, Luck, Tony wrote:
>>
>> 2. use boot option
>> This is our proposal. New boot option can specify memory range to use
>> as movable memory.
>
> Isn't this just moving the work to the user? To pick good values for the
> movable areas, they need to know how the memory
> 1. use firmware information
> According to ACPI spec 5.0, SRAT table has memory affinity structure
> and the structure has Hot Pluggable Filed. See "5.2.16.2 Memory
> Affinity Structure". If we use the information, we might be able to
> specify movable memory by firmware. For example, if
Hi all,
Seems it's a great chance to discuss about the memory hotplug feature
within this thread. So I will try to give some high level thoughts about memory
hotplug feature on x86/IA64. Any comments are welcomed!
First of all, I think usability really matters. Ideally, memory
At 11/28/2012 04:28 PM, Jiang Liu Wrote:
> On 2012-11-28 16:29, Wen Congyang wrote:
>> At 11/28/2012 12:08 PM, Jiang Liu Wrote:
>>> On 2012-11-28 11:24, Bob Liu wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Tang Chen wrote:
> On 11/27/2012 08:09 PM, Bob Liu wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 27,
On 2012-11-28 16:29, Wen Congyang wrote:
> At 11/28/2012 12:08 PM, Jiang Liu Wrote:
>> On 2012-11-28 11:24, Bob Liu wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Tang Chen wrote:
On 11/27/2012 08:09 PM, Bob Liu wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Tang Chen
> wrote:
>>
At 11/28/2012 12:08 PM, Jiang Liu Wrote:
> On 2012-11-28 11:24, Bob Liu wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Tang Chen wrote:
>>> On 11/27/2012 08:09 PM, Bob Liu wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Tang Chen
wrote:
>
> Hi Liu,
>
>
> This feature is
At 11/28/2012 12:08 PM, Jiang Liu Wrote:
On 2012-11-28 11:24, Bob Liu wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Tang Chen tangc...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
On 11/27/2012 08:09 PM, Bob Liu wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Tang Chentangc...@cn.fujitsu.com
wrote:
Hi Liu,
This feature is
On 2012-11-28 16:29, Wen Congyang wrote:
At 11/28/2012 12:08 PM, Jiang Liu Wrote:
On 2012-11-28 11:24, Bob Liu wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Tang Chen tangc...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
On 11/27/2012 08:09 PM, Bob Liu wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Tang
At 11/28/2012 04:28 PM, Jiang Liu Wrote:
On 2012-11-28 16:29, Wen Congyang wrote:
At 11/28/2012 12:08 PM, Jiang Liu Wrote:
On 2012-11-28 11:24, Bob Liu wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Tang Chen tangc...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
On 11/27/2012 08:09 PM, Bob Liu wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27,
Hi all,
Seems it's a great chance to discuss about the memory hotplug feature
within this thread. So I will try to give some high level thoughts about memory
hotplug feature on x86/IA64. Any comments are welcomed!
First of all, I think usability really matters. Ideally, memory
1. use firmware information
According to ACPI spec 5.0, SRAT table has memory affinity structure
and the structure has Hot Pluggable Filed. See 5.2.16.2 Memory
Affinity Structure. If we use the information, we might be able to
specify movable memory by firmware. For example, if Hot
On 11/28/2012 01:34 PM, Luck, Tony wrote:
2. use boot option
This is our proposal. New boot option can specify memory range to use
as movable memory.
Isn't this just moving the work to the user? To pick good values for the
movable areas, they need to know how the memory lines up across
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 04:29:01PM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
At 11/28/2012 12:08 PM, Jiang Liu Wrote:
On 2012-11-28 11:24, Bob Liu wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Tang Chen tangc...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
On 11/27/2012 08:09 PM, Bob Liu wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Tang
On 11/29/2012 08:43 AM, Jaegeuk Hanse wrote:
Hi Tang,
I haven't read the patchset yet, but could you give a short describe how
you design your implementation in this patchset?
Regards,
Jaegeuk
Hi Jaegeuk,
Thanks for your joining in. :)
This feature is used in memory hotplug.
In order to
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 04:47:42PM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
Hi all,
Seems it's a great chance to discuss about the memory hotplug feature
within this thread. So I will try to give some high level thoughts about memory
hotplug feature on x86/IA64. Any comments are welcomed!
First of
On 2012-11-29 9:42, Jaegeuk Hanse wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 04:47:42PM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
Hi all,
Seems it's a great chance to discuss about the memory hotplug feature
within this thread. So I will try to give some high level thoughts about
memory
hotplug feature on x86/IA64.
On 2012-11-29 10:49, Wanpeng Li wrote:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 10:25:40AM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
On 2012-11-29 9:42, Jaegeuk Hanse wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 04:47:42PM +0800, Jiang Liu wrote:
Hi all,
Seems it's a great chance to discuss about the memory hotplug feature
within this
Hi Chen,
If a pageblock's migration type is movable, it may be converted to
reclaimable under memory pressure. CMA is introduced to guarantee
that pages of CMA won't be converted to other migratetypes.
And we are trying to avoid allocating kernel/DMA memory from specific
memory ranges, so we
Hi Bob, Liu Jiang,
About CMA, could you give me more info ?
Thanks for your patent and nice advice. :)
1) I saw the following on http://lwn.net/Articles/447405/:
The "CMA" type is sticky; pages which are marked as being for CMA
should never have their migration type changed by the kernel.
As
On 2012-11-28 13:21, Wen Congyang wrote:
> At 11/28/2012 12:01 PM, Jiang Liu Wrote:
>> On 2012-11-28 11:47, Tang Chen wrote:
>>> On 11/27/2012 11:10 AM, wujianguo wrote:
Hi Tang,
DMA address can't be set as movable, if some one boot kernel with
movablecore_map=4G@0xa0
At 11/28/2012 12:01 PM, Jiang Liu Wrote:
> On 2012-11-28 11:47, Tang Chen wrote:
>> On 11/27/2012 11:10 AM, wujianguo wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Tang,
>>> DMA address can't be set as movable, if some one boot kernel with
>>> movablecore_map=4G@0xa0 or other memory region that contains DMA
>>>
On 2012/11/28 11:47, Tang Chen wrote:
> On 11/27/2012 11:10 AM, wujianguo wrote:
>>
>> Hi Tang,
>> DMA address can't be set as movable, if some one boot kernel with
>> movablecore_map=4G@0xa0 or other memory region that contains DMA address,
>> system maybe boot failed. Should this case
On 2012-11-28 11:24, Bob Liu wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Tang Chen wrote:
>> On 11/27/2012 08:09 PM, Bob Liu wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Tang Chen
>>> wrote:
Hi Liu,
This feature is used in memory hotplug.
In order to implement
On 2012-11-28 11:47, Tang Chen wrote:
> On 11/27/2012 11:10 AM, wujianguo wrote:
>>
>> Hi Tang,
>> DMA address can't be set as movable, if some one boot kernel with
>> movablecore_map=4G@0xa0 or other memory region that contains DMA address,
>> system maybe boot failed. Should this case be
On 11/27/2012 11:10 AM, wujianguo wrote:
Hi Tang,
DMA address can't be set as movable, if some one boot kernel with
movablecore_map=4G@0xa0 or other memory region that contains DMA address,
system maybe boot failed. Should this case be handled or mentioned
in the change log and
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Tang Chen wrote:
> On 11/27/2012 08:09 PM, Bob Liu wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Tang Chen
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Liu,
>>>
>>>
>>> This feature is used in memory hotplug.
>>>
>>> In order to implement a whole node hotplug, we need to make sure the
On 11/27/2012 08:09 PM, Bob Liu wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Tang Chen wrote:
Hi Liu,
This feature is used in memory hotplug.
In order to implement a whole node hotplug, we need to make sure the
node contains no kernel memory, because memory used by kernel could
not be migrated.
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Tang Chen wrote:
> On 11/27/2012 04:00 PM, Bob Liu wrote:
>>
>> Hi Tang,
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Tang Chen
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> [What we are doing]
>>> This patchset provide a boot option for user to specify ZONE_MOVABLE
>>> memory
>>> map for each
Hi HPA and Tang,
2012/11/27 17:49, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
On 11/27/2012 12:29 AM, Tang Chen wrote:
Another approach is like the following:
movable_node = 1,3-5,8
This could set all the memory on the nodes to be movable. And the rest
of memory works as usual. But movablecore_map is more
On 11/27/2012 01:47 AM, Wen Congyang wrote:
At 11/27/2012 04:49 PM, H. Peter Anvin Wrote:
On 11/27/2012 12:29 AM, Tang Chen wrote:
Another approach is like the following:
movable_node = 1,3-5,8
This could set all the memory on the nodes to be movable. And the rest
of memory works as usual. But
At 11/27/2012 04:49 PM, H. Peter Anvin Wrote:
> On 11/27/2012 12:29 AM, Tang Chen wrote:
>> Another approach is like the following:
>> movable_node = 1,3-5,8
>> This could set all the memory on the nodes to be movable. And the rest
>> of memory works as usual. But movablecore_map is more flexible.
On 11/27/2012 12:29 AM, Tang Chen wrote:
> Another approach is like the following:
> movable_node = 1,3-5,8
> This could set all the memory on the nodes to be movable. And the rest
> of memory works as usual. But movablecore_map is more flexible.
... but *much* harder for users, so movable_node
On 11/27/2012 04:00 PM, Bob Liu wrote:
Hi Tang,
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Tang Chen wrote:
[What we are doing]
This patchset provide a boot option for user to specify ZONE_MOVABLE memory
map for each node in the system.
movablecore_map=nn[KMG]@ss[KMG]
This option make sure memory
Hi Tang,
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Tang Chen wrote:
> [What we are doing]
> This patchset provide a boot option for user to specify ZONE_MOVABLE memory
> map for each node in the system.
>
> movablecore_map=nn[KMG]@ss[KMG]
>
> This option make sure memory range from ss to ss+nn is movable
Hi Tang,
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Tang Chen tangc...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
[What we are doing]
This patchset provide a boot option for user to specify ZONE_MOVABLE memory
map for each node in the system.
movablecore_map=nn[KMG]@ss[KMG]
This option make sure memory range from ss to
On 11/27/2012 04:00 PM, Bob Liu wrote:
Hi Tang,
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Tang Chentangc...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
[What we are doing]
This patchset provide a boot option for user to specify ZONE_MOVABLE memory
map for each node in the system.
movablecore_map=nn[KMG]@ss[KMG]
This
On 11/27/2012 12:29 AM, Tang Chen wrote:
Another approach is like the following:
movable_node = 1,3-5,8
This could set all the memory on the nodes to be movable. And the rest
of memory works as usual. But movablecore_map is more flexible.
... but *much* harder for users, so movable_node is
At 11/27/2012 04:49 PM, H. Peter Anvin Wrote:
On 11/27/2012 12:29 AM, Tang Chen wrote:
Another approach is like the following:
movable_node = 1,3-5,8
This could set all the memory on the nodes to be movable. And the rest
of memory works as usual. But movablecore_map is more flexible.
...
On 11/27/2012 01:47 AM, Wen Congyang wrote:
At 11/27/2012 04:49 PM, H. Peter Anvin Wrote:
On 11/27/2012 12:29 AM, Tang Chen wrote:
Another approach is like the following:
movable_node = 1,3-5,8
This could set all the memory on the nodes to be movable. And the rest
of memory works as usual. But
Hi HPA and Tang,
2012/11/27 17:49, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
On 11/27/2012 12:29 AM, Tang Chen wrote:
Another approach is like the following:
movable_node = 1,3-5,8
This could set all the memory on the nodes to be movable. And the rest
of memory works as usual. But movablecore_map is more
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Tang Chen tangc...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
On 11/27/2012 04:00 PM, Bob Liu wrote:
Hi Tang,
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Tang Chentangc...@cn.fujitsu.com
wrote:
[What we are doing]
This patchset provide a boot option for user to specify ZONE_MOVABLE
On 11/27/2012 08:09 PM, Bob Liu wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Tang Chentangc...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
Hi Liu,
This feature is used in memory hotplug.
In order to implement a whole node hotplug, we need to make sure the
node contains no kernel memory, because memory used by kernel
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Tang Chen tangc...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
On 11/27/2012 08:09 PM, Bob Liu wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Tang Chentangc...@cn.fujitsu.com
wrote:
Hi Liu,
This feature is used in memory hotplug.
In order to implement a whole node hotplug, we need
On 11/27/2012 11:10 AM, wujianguo wrote:
Hi Tang,
DMA address can't be set as movable, if some one boot kernel with
movablecore_map=4G@0xa0 or other memory region that contains DMA address,
system maybe boot failed. Should this case be handled or mentioned
in the change log and
On 2012-11-28 11:47, Tang Chen wrote:
On 11/27/2012 11:10 AM, wujianguo wrote:
Hi Tang,
DMA address can't be set as movable, if some one boot kernel with
movablecore_map=4G@0xa0 or other memory region that contains DMA address,
system maybe boot failed. Should this case be handled or
On 2012-11-28 11:24, Bob Liu wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Tang Chen tangc...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
On 11/27/2012 08:09 PM, Bob Liu wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Tang Chentangc...@cn.fujitsu.com
wrote:
Hi Liu,
This feature is used in memory hotplug.
In order to
On 2012/11/28 11:47, Tang Chen wrote:
On 11/27/2012 11:10 AM, wujianguo wrote:
Hi Tang,
DMA address can't be set as movable, if some one boot kernel with
movablecore_map=4G@0xa0 or other memory region that contains DMA address,
system maybe boot failed. Should this case be handled
At 11/28/2012 12:01 PM, Jiang Liu Wrote:
On 2012-11-28 11:47, Tang Chen wrote:
On 11/27/2012 11:10 AM, wujianguo wrote:
Hi Tang,
DMA address can't be set as movable, if some one boot kernel with
movablecore_map=4G@0xa0 or other memory region that contains DMA
address,
system maybe
On 2012-11-28 13:21, Wen Congyang wrote:
At 11/28/2012 12:01 PM, Jiang Liu Wrote:
On 2012-11-28 11:47, Tang Chen wrote:
On 11/27/2012 11:10 AM, wujianguo wrote:
Hi Tang,
DMA address can't be set as movable, if some one boot kernel with
movablecore_map=4G@0xa0 or other memory region
Hi Bob, Liu Jiang,
About CMA, could you give me more info ?
Thanks for your patent and nice advice. :)
1) I saw the following on http://lwn.net/Articles/447405/:
The CMA type is sticky; pages which are marked as being for CMA
should never have their migration type changed by the kernel.
As
Hi Chen,
If a pageblock's migration type is movable, it may be converted to
reclaimable under memory pressure. CMA is introduced to guarantee
that pages of CMA won't be converted to other migratetypes.
And we are trying to avoid allocating kernel/DMA memory from specific
memory ranges, so we
On 2012/11/27 13:43, Tang Chen wrote:
> On 11/27/2012 11:10 AM, wujianguo wrote:
>> On 2012-11-23 18:44, Tang Chen wrote:
>>> [What we are doing]
>>> This patchset provide a boot option for user to specify ZONE_MOVABLE memory
>>> map for each node in the system.
>>>
>>>
On 11/26/2012 09:43 PM, Tang Chen wrote:
And about how to fix it, as you said, we can handle the situation if
user specified DMA address as movable. But how to handle "too little
memory for kernel to start" case ? Is there any info about how much
at least memory kernel needs ?
Not really,
On 11/27/2012 11:10 AM, wujianguo wrote:
On 2012-11-23 18:44, Tang Chen wrote:
[What we are doing]
This patchset provide a boot option for user to specify ZONE_MOVABLE memory
map for each node in the system.
movablecore_map=nn[KMG]@ss[KMG]
Hi Tang,
DMA address can't be set as
On 2012-11-23 18:44, Tang Chen wrote:
> [What we are doing]
> This patchset provide a boot option for user to specify ZONE_MOVABLE memory
> map for each node in the system.
>
> movablecore_map=nn[KMG]@ss[KMG]
>
Hi Tang,
DMA address can't be set as movable, if some one boot kernel with
On 2012-11-23 18:44, Tang Chen wrote:
[What we are doing]
This patchset provide a boot option for user to specify ZONE_MOVABLE memory
map for each node in the system.
movablecore_map=nn[KMG]@ss[KMG]
Hi Tang,
DMA address can't be set as movable, if some one boot kernel with
On 11/27/2012 11:10 AM, wujianguo wrote:
On 2012-11-23 18:44, Tang Chen wrote:
[What we are doing]
This patchset provide a boot option for user to specify ZONE_MOVABLE memory
map for each node in the system.
movablecore_map=nn[KMG]@ss[KMG]
Hi Tang,
DMA address can't be set as
On 11/26/2012 09:43 PM, Tang Chen wrote:
And about how to fix it, as you said, we can handle the situation if
user specified DMA address as movable. But how to handle too little
memory for kernel to start case ? Is there any info about how much
at least memory kernel needs ?
Not really, and
On 2012/11/27 13:43, Tang Chen wrote:
On 11/27/2012 11:10 AM, wujianguo wrote:
On 2012-11-23 18:44, Tang Chen wrote:
[What we are doing]
This patchset provide a boot option for user to specify ZONE_MOVABLE memory
map for each node in the system.
movablecore_map=nn[KMG]@ss[KMG]
Hi Tang,
[What we are doing]
This patchset provide a boot option for user to specify ZONE_MOVABLE memory
map for each node in the system.
movablecore_map=nn[KMG]@ss[KMG]
This option make sure memory range from ss to ss+nn is movable memory.
[Why we do this]
If we hot remove a memroy, the memory cannot
[What we are doing]
This patchset provide a boot option for user to specify ZONE_MOVABLE memory
map for each node in the system.
movablecore_map=nn[KMG]@ss[KMG]
This option make sure memory range from ss to ss+nn is movable memory.
[Why we do this]
If we hot remove a memroy, the memory cannot
100 matches
Mail list logo
