Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] Generate address range data for built-in modules

2024-05-15 Thread Masahiro Yamada
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 1:50 AM Kris Van Hees wrote: > > On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 01:43:15PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > On Sun, May 12, 2024 at 7:42???AM Kris Van Hees > > wrote: > > > > > > Especially for tracing applications, it is convenient to be able to > > > refer to a symbol using a

Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] Generate address range data for built-in modules

2024-05-15 Thread Kris Van Hees
On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 01:43:15PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > On Sun, May 12, 2024 at 7:42???AM Kris Van Hees > wrote: > > > > Especially for tracing applications, it is convenient to be able to > > refer to a symbol using a pair and to be able > > to translate an address into a pair. But

Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] Generate address range data for built-in modules

2024-05-12 Thread Masahiro Yamada
On Sun, May 12, 2024 at 7:42 AM Kris Van Hees wrote: > > Especially for tracing applications, it is convenient to be able to > refer to a symbol using a pair and to be able > to translate an address into a pair. But > that does not work if the module is built into the kernel because the > objec

[PATCH v2 0/6] Generate address range data for built-in modules

2024-05-11 Thread Kris Van Hees
Especially for tracing applications, it is convenient to be able to refer to a symbol using a pair and to be able to translate an address into a pair. But that does not work if the module is built into the kernel because the object files that comprise the built-in module implementation are simpl