On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 02:01:18PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-04-22 at 17:01 +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>
> > Hello, Ingo and Peter.
> >
> > Just ping for this patchset.
>
> The patches look fine -- except a few cosmetic changes. I'm fine with
> Ingo taking them now and merging a
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 01:07:07PM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-04-22 at 14:01 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Mon, 2013-04-22 at 17:01 +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> >
> > > Hello, Ingo and Peter.
> > >
> > > Just ping for this patchset.
> >
> > The patches look fine -- except
On Mon, 2013-04-22 at 14:01 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-04-22 at 17:01 +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>
> > Hello, Ingo and Peter.
> >
> > Just ping for this patchset.
>
> The patches look fine -- except a few cosmetic changes. I'm fine with
> Ingo taking them now and merging a 7/6 pa
On Mon, 2013-04-22 at 17:01 +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> Hello, Ingo and Peter.
>
> Just ping for this patchset.
The patches look fine -- except a few cosmetic changes. I'm fine with
Ingo taking them now and merging a 7/6 patch that clears up the
cosmetic issues or you can repost with them taken
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 03:01:34PM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> Commit 88b8dac0 makes load_balance() consider other cpus in its group.
> But, there are some missing parts for this feature to work properly.
> This patchset correct these things and make load_balance() robust.
>
> Others are related t
Commit 88b8dac0 makes load_balance() consider other cpus in its group.
But, there are some missing parts for this feature to work properly.
This patchset correct these things and make load_balance() robust.
Others are related to LBF_ALL_PINNED. This is fallback functionality
when all tasks can't b
6 matches
Mail list logo
