On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 02:52:15PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 08/26, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > On 08/25, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 05:34:31PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I booted the kernel with the additional patch below, and nothing bad h
On 08/26, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> On 08/25, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 05:34:31PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > >
> > > I booted the kernel with the additional patch below, and nothing bad has
> > > happened, it continues to print
> > >
> > > Writes: Total: 2 Max
On 08/25, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 05:34:31PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > I booted the kernel with the additional patch below, and nothing bad has
> > happened, it continues to print
> >
> > Writes: Total: 2 Max/Min: 0/0 Fail: 0
> > Reads : Total: 2
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 05:34:31PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 08/22, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >
> > Queued for testing, thank you, Oleg!
>
> Thanks Paul!
I cannot really test it, but thus far it has at least not broken anything
else.
> > Right now, this is mostly relying on 0day and -next
On 08/22, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> Queued for testing, thank you, Oleg!
Thanks Paul!
> Right now, this is mostly relying on 0day and -next testing. Any thoughts
> for a useful torture test for this?
Right now I do not have any idea how to write the meaningful test for
rcu_sync... Perhaps som
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 07:42:30PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Now that sb->s_writers was changed to use percpu_rw_semaphore let me
> send v2.
>
> Changes:
>
> - whitespace fix in 1/8.
>
> - remove EXPORT_SYMBOL() in 3/8, currently rcu_sync has no
> modular user
Hello,
Now that sb->s_writers was changed to use percpu_rw_semaphore let me
send v2.
Changes:
- whitespace fix in 1/8.
- remove EXPORT_SYMBOL() in 3/8, currently rcu_sync has no
modular users.
- 5/8 is new. This ugly hack pairs with another one:
"shi
7 matches
Mail list logo