Re: [PATCH v2 00/01] KVM: x86: never specify a sample period for virtualized in_tx_cp counters

2017-02-23 Thread Robert O'Callahan
Great, thanks! Rob -- lbir ye,ea yer.tnietoehr rdn rdsme,anea lurpr edna e hnysnenh hhe uresyf toD selthor stor edna siewaoeodm or v sstvr esBa kbvted,t rdsme,aoreseoouoto o l euetiuruewFa kbn e hnystoivateweh uresyf tulsa rehr rdm or rnea lurpr .a war hsrer holsa rodvted,t nenh hneir

Re: [PATCH v2 00/01] KVM: x86: never specify a sample period for virtualized in_tx_cp counters

2017-02-23 Thread Paolo Bonzini
On 23/02/2017 03:56, Robert O'Callahan wrote: > Ping? Is there something else I need to do to get someone to look at this? Nothing to do, we will pick it up for 4.11. Paolo

Re: [PATCH v2 00/01] KVM: x86: never specify a sample period for virtualized in_tx_cp counters

2017-02-22 Thread Robert O'Callahan
Ping? Is there something else I need to do to get someone to look at this? Thanks, Rob -- lbir ye,ea yer.tnietoehr rdn rdsme,anea lurpr edna e hnysnenh hhe uresyf toD selthor stor edna siewaoeodm or v sstvr esBa kbvted,t rdsme,aoreseoouoto o l euetiuruewFa kbn e hnystoivateweh uresyf tul

[PATCH v2 00/01] KVM: x86: never specify a sample period for virtualized in_tx_cp counters

2017-01-31 Thread Robert O'Callahan
Changes in version 2: - Fixed block comment formatting as requested by Ingo Molnar - Changed commit summary to refer to a testcase that more easily shows the problem. For reference here's a complete testcase for an Intel TSX-enabled KVM guest: #include #include #include #include #include #in