Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] CMA: generalize CMA reserved area management code

Joonsoo Kim writes: > On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 12:55:39PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: >> Joonsoo Kim writes: >> >> > Currently, there are two users on CMA functionality, one is the DMA >> > subsystem and the other is the kvm on powerpc. They have their own code >> > to manage CMA reserved are

Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] CMA: generalize CMA reserved area management code

On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 12:55:39PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > Joonsoo Kim writes: > > > Currently, there are two users on CMA functionality, one is the DMA > > subsystem and the other is the kvm on powerpc. They have their own code > > to manage CMA reserved area even if they looks really s

Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] CMA: generalize CMA reserved area management code

Joonsoo Kim writes: > Currently, there are two users on CMA functionality, one is the DMA > subsystem and the other is the kvm on powerpc. They have their own code > to manage CMA reserved area even if they looks really similar. > From my guess, it is caused by some needs on bitmap management. Kv

[PATCH v2 00/10] CMA: generalize CMA reserved area management code

Currently, there are two users on CMA functionality, one is the DMA subsystem and the other is the kvm on powerpc. They have their own code to manage CMA reserved area even if they looks really similar. >From my guess, it is caused by some needs on bitmap management. Kvm side wants to maintain bitm