subject:"\[PATCH v2 00\/10\] mm, hugetlb\: clean\-up and possible bug fix"

Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] mm, hugetlb: clean-up and possible bug fix

2013-07-23 Thread Joonsoo Kim

On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 09:21:38PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > Joonsoo Kim writes: > > > First 6 patches are almost trivial clean-up patches. > > > > The others are for fixing three bugs. > > Perhaps, these problems are minor, because this codes are used > > for a long time, and there is no

Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] mm, hugetlb: clean-up and possible bug fix

2013-07-22 Thread Aneesh Kumar K.V

Joonsoo Kim writes: > First 6 patches are almost trivial clean-up patches. > > The others are for fixing three bugs. > Perhaps, these problems are minor, because this codes are used > for a long time, and there is no bug reporting for these problems. > > These patches are based on v3.10.0 and > p

[PATCH v2 00/10] mm, hugetlb: clean-up and possible bug fix

2013-07-22 Thread Joonsoo Kim

First 6 patches are almost trivial clean-up patches. The others are for fixing three bugs. Perhaps, these problems are minor, because this codes are used for a long time, and there is no bug reporting for these problems. These patches are based on v3.10.0 and passed the libhugetlbfs test suite.