On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 5:31 PM Nick Desaulniers
wrote:
>
> So I did:
Ack, I have the series, and it looks fine to me.
> Actually, looks like a lot of merged PRs come from github! Grizzly
> Adams *did* have a beard!
Oh, I think github is an _excellent_ hosting service.
I just can't stand thei
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 3:58 PM Nick Desaulniers
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 3:40 PM Linus Torvalds
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 3:24 PM Nick Desaulniers
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Otherwise, is there any additional feedback on this series or is it good
> > > to go?
> >
> > I've
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 3:40 PM Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 3:24 PM Nick Desaulniers
> wrote:
> >
> > Otherwise, is there any additional feedback on this series or is it good to
> > go?
>
> I've lost sight of the series. I'm sure it is fine, but maybe you can
> resend it to
On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 3:24 PM Nick Desaulniers
wrote:
>
> Otherwise, is there any additional feedback on this series or is it good to
> go?
I've lost sight of the series. I'm sure it is fine, but maybe you can
resend it to me (in private, if it's already been going out on the
mailing lists and
On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 12:36 PM Nick Desaulniers
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 2:00 PM Nick Desaulniers
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 3:11 PM Brian Gerst wrote:
> > >
> > > The core percpu operations already have a switch on the width of the
> > > data type, which resulted in an
On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 12:36 PM Nick Desaulniers
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 2:00 PM Nick Desaulniers
> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 3:11 PM Brian Gerst wrote:
> > >
> > > The core percpu operations already have a switch on the width of the
> > > data type, which resulted in an
On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 06:11:17PM -0400, Brian Gerst wrote:
> The core percpu operations already have a switch on the width of the
> data type, which resulted in an extra amount of dead code being
> generated with the x86 operations having another switch. This patch set
> rewrites the x86 ops to
On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 2:00 PM Nick Desaulniers wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 3:11 PM Brian Gerst wrote:
> >
> > The core percpu operations already have a switch on the width of the
> > data type, which resulted in an extra amount of dead code being
> > generated with the x86 operations havi
On Sat, May 30, 2020 at 3:11 PM Brian Gerst wrote:
>
> The core percpu operations already have a switch on the width of the
> data type, which resulted in an extra amount of dead code being
> generated with the x86 operations having another switch. This patch set
> rewrites the x86 ops to remove
The core percpu operations already have a switch on the width of the
data type, which resulted in an extra amount of dead code being
generated with the x86 operations having another switch. This patch set
rewrites the x86 ops to remove the switch. Additional cleanups are to
use named assembly ope
10 matches
Mail list logo
