Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] getting back -Wmaybe-uninitialized

On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 09:47:41AM +0100, Greg KH wrote: > On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 01:27:12PM +, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > On 11/11/16 19:49, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > On Friday, November 11, 2016 9:13:00 AM CET Linus Torvalds wrote: > > >> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 8:44 AM, Arnd Bergmann

Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] getting back -Wmaybe-uninitialized

On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 09:47:41AM +0100, Greg KH wrote: > On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 01:27:12PM +, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > On 11/11/16 19:49, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > On Friday, November 11, 2016 9:13:00 AM CET Linus Torvalds wrote: > > >> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 8:44 AM, Arnd Bergmann

Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] getting back -Wmaybe-uninitialized

On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 01:27:12PM +, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On 11/11/16 19:49, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Friday, November 11, 2016 9:13:00 AM CET Linus Torvalds wrote: > >> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 8:44 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > >>> > >>> Please merge these directly if

Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] getting back -Wmaybe-uninitialized

On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 01:27:12PM +, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On 11/11/16 19:49, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Friday, November 11, 2016 9:13:00 AM CET Linus Torvalds wrote: > >> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 8:44 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > >>> > >>> Please merge these directly if you are happy

Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] getting back -Wmaybe-uninitialized

On 11/11/16 19:49, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday, November 11, 2016 9:13:00 AM CET Linus Torvalds wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 8:44 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >>> >>> Please merge these directly if you are happy with the result. >> >> I will take this. > > Thanks a lot! >

Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] getting back -Wmaybe-uninitialized

On 11/11/16 19:49, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday, November 11, 2016 9:13:00 AM CET Linus Torvalds wrote: >> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 8:44 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >>> >>> Please merge these directly if you are happy with the result. >> >> I will take this. > > Thanks a lot! > >> I do see two

Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] getting back -Wmaybe-uninitialized

On Friday, November 11, 2016 9:13:00 AM CET Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 8:44 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > Please merge these directly if you are happy with the result. > > I will take this. Thanks a lot! > I do see two warnings, but they both seem to be

Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] getting back -Wmaybe-uninitialized

On Friday, November 11, 2016 9:13:00 AM CET Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 8:44 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > > Please merge these directly if you are happy with the result. > > I will take this. Thanks a lot! > I do see two warnings, but they both seem to be valid and

Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] getting back -Wmaybe-uninitialized

On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 8:44 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > Please merge these directly if you are happy with the result. I will take this. I do see two warnings, but they both seem to be valid and recent, though, so I have no issues with the spurious cases. Warning #1:

Re: [PATCH v2 00/11] getting back -Wmaybe-uninitialized

On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 8:44 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > Please merge these directly if you are happy with the result. I will take this. I do see two warnings, but they both seem to be valid and recent, though, so I have no issues with the spurious cases. Warning #1:

[PATCH v2 00/11] getting back -Wmaybe-uninitialized

Hi Linus, It took a while for some patches to make it into mainline through maintainer trees, but the 28-patch series is now reduced to 10, with one tiny patch added at the end. I hope this can still make it into v4.9. Aside from patches that are no longer required, I did these changes compared

[PATCH v2 00/11] getting back -Wmaybe-uninitialized

Hi Linus, It took a while for some patches to make it into mainline through maintainer trees, but the 28-patch series is now reduced to 10, with one tiny patch added at the end. I hope this can still make it into v4.9. Aside from patches that are no longer required, I did these changes compared