On 10/10/2017 06:27 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 04:56:57PM -0500, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/06/2017 06:07 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 09:22:17AM -0500, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
On 09/28/2017 04:56 AM, Thierry Reding wr
On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 04:56:57PM -0500, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>
>
> On 10/06/2017 06:07 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 09:22:17AM -0500, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 09/28/2017 04:56 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> >>> From: Thierry Reding
> >>>
> >>> Hi Lin
On 10/06/2017 06:07 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 09:22:17AM -0500, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 09/28/2017 04:56 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
>>> From: Thierry Reding
>>>
>>> Hi Linus,
>>>
>>> here's the latest series of patches that implement the tighter IRQ chip
>>>
On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 01:07:49PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 09:22:17AM -0500, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
[...]
> > - all GPIO IRQs mapped statically
>
> This series predates your work on the dynamic IRQ mapping, so I hadn't
> picked up those changes. This should be easi
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 09:22:17AM -0500, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>
>
> On 09/28/2017 04:56 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > From: Thierry Reding
> >
> > Hi Linus,
> >
> > here's the latest series of patches that implement the tighter IRQ chip
> > integration as well as the banked GPIO infrastru
On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 8:26 PM, Grygorii Strashko
wrote:
> On 10/02/2017 02:55 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Grygorii Strashko
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Sry, but I do not agree with this series.
>>> - no prof that it can be re-used by other drivers than tegra
>>> (at least
On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 9:55 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> This is not necessarily a blocker if it can be shown that others than
> TI/OMAP can reuse it.
>
> I've looked at things like the imagination pistachio:
>
> pinctrl@18101C00 {
> compatible = "img,pistachio-system-pinctrl";
> re
On 10/02/2017 02:55 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Grygorii Strashko
> wrote:
>
>> Sry, but I do not agree with this series.
>> - no prof that it can be re-used by other drivers than tegra
>> (at least I do not see reasons to re-use it for any TI drivers)
>
> Thi
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Grygorii Strashko
wrote:
> Sry, but I do not agree with this series.
> - no prof that it can be re-used by other drivers than tegra
> (at least I do not see reasons to re-use it for any TI drivers)
This is not necessarily a blocker if it can be shown that others
On 09/28/2017 04:56 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> From: Thierry Reding
>
> Hi Linus,
>
> here's the latest series of patches that implement the tighter IRQ chip
> integration as well as the banked GPIO infrastructure that we had
> discussed a couple of weeks/months back.
>
> The first couple of
From: Thierry Reding
Hi Linus,
here's the latest series of patches that implement the tighter IRQ chip
integration as well as the banked GPIO infrastructure that we had
discussed a couple of weeks/months back.
The first couple of patches are mostly preparatory work in order to
consolidate all I
11 matches
Mail list logo
