On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 09:06:45AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Dec 2014 16:59:52 +
> Al Viro wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 06:54:08AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> >
> > > > Umm... I would be very surprised if it turned out to be a problem.
> > > > nfsd really doesn't give a
On Fri, 12 Dec 2014 16:59:52 +
Al Viro wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 06:54:08AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
>
> > > Umm... I would be very surprised if it turned out to be a problem.
> > > nfsd really doesn't give a fuck about its cwd and root - not in the
> > > thread side of things. And
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 06:54:08AM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> > Umm... I would be very surprised if it turned out to be a problem.
> > nfsd really doesn't give a fuck about its cwd and root - not in the
> > thread side of things. And (un)exporting is (a) not on a hot path
> > and (b) not done f
On Fri, 12 Dec 2014 03:02:06 +
Al Viro wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 06:29:37PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 6:12 PM, Al Viro wrote:
> > >
> > > Linus, do you see any problems with the following patch (against the
> > > mainline)?
> >
> > Not concpetually, bu
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 03:02:06AM +, Al Viro wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 06:29:37PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 6:12 PM, Al Viro wrote:
> > >
> > > Linus, do you see any problems with the following patch (against the
> > > mainline)?
> >
> > Not concpetuall
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 06:29:37PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 6:12 PM, Al Viro wrote:
> >
> > Linus, do you see any problems with the following patch (against the
> > mainline)?
>
> Not concpetually, but create_kthread() uses CLONE_FS, and I don't
> think it's just um
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 02:12:41AM +, Al Viro wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 02:07:44PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
>
> > We'll also need Al's ACK on the fs_struct stuff.
>
> ... and I'm not happy with it. First of all, ditch those EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL();
> if it's too low-level for general exp
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 6:12 PM, Al Viro wrote:
>
> Linus, do you see any problems with the following patch (against the
> mainline)?
Not concpetually, but create_kthread() uses CLONE_FS, and I don't
think it's just umask that things like nfsd want to avoid sharing.
What about all the *other* fi
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 02:07:44PM -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> We'll also need Al's ACK on the fs_struct stuff.
... and I'm not happy with it. First of all, ditch those EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL();
if it's too low-level for general export (and many of those are), tacking
_GPL on it doesn't make it any b
On Wed, 10 Dec 2014 14:31:55 -0800
Chuck Lever wrote:
> Hi Jeff-
>
> On Dec 10, 2014, at 11:07 AM, Jeff Layton wrote:
>
> > This is the second revision of the workqueue-based nfsd. Changes from
> > the RFC version I posted earlier:
> >
> > v2:
> > - found and fixed problem causing the delays
Hi Jeff-
On Dec 10, 2014, at 11:07 AM, Jeff Layton wrote:
> This is the second revision of the workqueue-based nfsd. Changes from
> the RFC version I posted earlier:
>
> v2:
> - found and fixed problem causing the delays between work. It was a bug
> in the design of the new code. I was queuein
This is the second revision of the workqueue-based nfsd. Changes from
the RFC version I posted earlier:
v2:
- found and fixed problem causing the delays between work. It was a bug
in the design of the new code. I was queueing the svc_xprt's work to
do everything and that necessarily serialized
12 matches
Mail list logo
